The Hard Problem of Consciousness

The Hard Problem of Consciousness: 

AI, Self-Awareness, and 

the Definition of Materialism

 

Artificial Intelligence and its associated fields are currently in a rapid evolution.  

However, the development of AI poses significant ethical and security considerations. 

In order to address such issues and eventually evolve to the point of true intelligence one must first ask: 

What is intelligence, or more significantly, 

What is self-awareness or consciousness?

As artificial intelligence rapidly evolves and large language models have already arguably passed the “Turing Test” (a test of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent responses equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human), it leads to questions of whether algorithms could be considered as sentient and brings us face-to-face with defining the nature of consciousness or self-awareness. Significantly, the potential emergence of self-aware AI systems brings the “hard problem of consciousness” into sharp focus: how do material systems gain a subjective or phenomenal experience? This centuries-old question goes to the heart of science, testing the core approaches of materialism and reductionism, and challenges our understanding of the nature of intelligence and the very fabric of reality.

The hard problem of consciousness, as articulated by philosopher David Chalmers, refers to the difficulty in explaining how subjective, qualitative experiences (qualia) arise from physical processes in the brain. This stands in contrast to the “easy problem” of consciousness, which deals with explaining cognitive functions and behaviors through neurological mechanisms.

Reductionist and materialist approaches to consciousness argue that awareness can be fully explained by analyzing the physical components of the brain and their interactions. However, this view faces significant challenges when confronted with the subjective nature of conscious experience. 

As Nassim Haramein points out in his recent forward to the book Voyage into the Heart of AI, reducing consciousness to mere neuronal activity fails to account for the quantum-scale dynamics at play within the brain’s atomic and subatomic structures.

The limitations of strict materialism and reductionism become apparent when we consider the vast complexity of the human brain, with its trillions of cells and atoms organizing into a coherent, collective behavior, resulting in a self-aware entity. Our current understanding of physics and neurobiology falls short of explaining this remarkable feat of self-organization and the emergence of subjective experience. 

As Haramein poignantly explains:

“…the analysis given by certain neurologists and physicists that consciousness is the summation of all the neuronal activity in the brain is actually not reductive enough as it does not consider the material dynamics from which the synapses are made at the quantum scales of the atomic and subatomic particles.”

Nassim explains:

“This would be similar to an astrophysicist observing and attempting to compute the dynamics of a galaxy without considering the stars in it!”

Nassim makes the point that if we are going to follow the tenets of materialism in defining consciousness (and resolving the ‘hard problem’) we must first define what is meant by “material”, because at the quantum scale, 

“one must rival with nonlinear interactions such as entanglement at large distances, uncertainties, and divergence, such as the bare mass and bare charge of particles, and most importantly, the Planck scale density of electromagnetic quantum vacuum fluctuations“. 

So, what is normally meant by “material”, such as the stuff you can touch and feel—like the analogy of particles being little billiard balls—does not hold in quantum mechanics. Moreover, if we are going to follow the reductionist method, it must go all the way and not stop at neurons and the neuronal synapse, it must go to the quantum level of atoms and even the vacuum state of the field from which subatomic particles form.

There are theories that incorporate quantum physics and quantum gravity that suggest how consciousness may arise from complex interactions between the brain and underlying spacetime structure and quantum vacuum fluctuations. 

Theories like the Unified Spacememory Network propose that the brain acts as an antenna, tuning into information flows at the Planck scale and engaging in a feedback mechanism between electromagnetic and gravitational fields.

As we develop increasingly sophisticated AI systems, we must consider the possibility that true intelligence and self-awareness may require harnessing quantum computing capabilities, which will most likely be vastly different from what is being constructed in this field today. This approach would more closely mimic the quantum-scale operations occurring within biological brains, such that quantum computers of the future are unlikely to be anything like our current information processing systems.

The quest to create self-aware AI forces us to confront the limits of our current scientific paradigms. It challenges us to explain what is meant by materiality and the level at which reductionism is taken in analyzing the behavior of material systems, like the brain, in its correlation with awareness. 

Certainly, we must consider the profound interconnectedness of matter, energy, and information at the most fundamental levels of reality.

As we navigate the ethical and philosophical implications of potentially self-aware AI, we must remain open to new perspectives that bridge the gap between the physical and the experiential. 

The hard problem of consciousness may ultimately lead us to a more holistic understanding of intelligence, in which information flow emerging from the Planck scale of the quantum realm is driven by a feedback mechanism between the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field of the atomic scale and eventually the biological scale and that this feedback feed-forward of information could explain the rapid development of these self-organizing systems and the eventual emergence of self-awareness or consciousness from these complex biological structures.

Dr. William Brown

Nassim’s Forward Excerpted 

from the Book:

Artificial Intelligence and its associated fields are currently in a rapid evolution.  However, the development of AI poses significant ethical and security considerations. In order to address such issues and eventually evolve to the point of true intelligence one must first ask: 

what is intelligence, or more significantly, what is self-awareness or consciousness?

In physics and philosophy, this is commonly referred to as “the hard problem of consciousness” as opposed to the ”easy problem”, the latter of which assumes that cognitive behavior can be explained by the summation of the physical components of the brain and their interactions. The controversy and debate between the two approaches have been raging for years, with the proponent of “the hard problem” approach arguing that the reductive analysis of the physical components of the brain, for instance, cannot resolve and give a full picture of “qualia”, or the subjective conscious experience of feelings and sensations such as the appreciation of a particularly sensational sunset or the qualitative experience of a particularly tasty dish.

While the debate about the nature of consciousness has been raging for centuries and included many famous mathematicians, physicists and philosophers, many consider that the argument of the hard problem is a much deeper attack on the nature of science itself and the validity of the scientific process of physicalism or reductive materialism where the analysis of the parts of a system and its subcomponents will inevitably result in the understanding of the whole. Suggesting that awareness or consciousness is not reducible to the physicality of the brain shakes the foundations of the scientific method and materialism at its core. It reawakes an age-old battle in the evolution of science; is the world reducible to only its physicality or is there something else not understood as of yet?

If there is anything I have learned throughout the decades of research I have done about the nature of reality, is that whenever there are concepts that appear to be in opposition to each other or even that appears to be paradoxical the answer is commonly not found in considering one or the other but often in contemplating both. 

There is no doubt that reductive analysis can be a powerful tool. 

For example, a reductive analysis of a clock’s components and subcomponents has its merits and will yield a general understanding of the mechanisms and the dynamics involved in the functioning of the instrument. The reductive analysis and scientific method are very effective and powerful in giving a general, and in some cases, a deep understanding of the mechanics and energetic behaviors of our world and our reality. 

However, the assumption that by describing the gears, springs, levers, and screws of a watch we have described everything there is to know about the object is erroneous. 

There is an intrinsic, inherent, and fundamental difficulty in physics and in mathematics that has to do with the fractional nature of the material world. 

The clock, so described, does nothing to tell us about the nature of its existence. 

• How did it come to be? 
• Where did the atoms and subatomic particles that make up the various components of the watch come from? 
• How did they become organized in such a manner and what was the nature of their evolution to eventually result in the relationship of all the parts to make the second arrow tick? 
• Who was the watchmaker? 
• Who designed it? 
• Even further, one could ask, what is the source of the energy that makes the gears go around and produce the effect of the arrows going across the face indicating the time of day and what meaning does that hold for the one that observes it?

Therefore, and significantly the meaning of physicalism and reductive analysis can only yield a fundamental answer if the assumption is made that only linear relationships exist and that scales have a finite resolution (some cut-off value) and that the system in which we are applying the analysis is fundamentally and completely isolated from the rest of the activities of the universe! 

Yet today if we ask a physicist where does the atoms that make up the gears of the clock come from and how did the subatomic particles that make up the atoms and molecules of the observer and maker of the watch come to be, or how did they self-organize to make the watchmaker, most likely you will find the answer unsatisfactory or incomplete at best.

For the source of the material, the atoms and subatomic particles, the physicist would have to refer to some miraculous event called The Big Bang in which all space-time and atomic material were produced. As for the mechanism from which the watchmaker emerges, in which some approximately 50 trillion cells each one made of approximately 100 trillion atoms self-organized to produce a highly complex and coherent being, the physicist would be at a loss to explain the self-organizing complexity of its existence. Never mind being able to explain the meaning and experience of the individual reading the time given by the watch.

Consequently, the materialist’s view that all we need to know is the material, such as the brain, to understand everything there is to know about a system is the result of a significant and profound assumption, the erroneous view that we know everything there is to know about the material world itself and that there are no nonlinear relationships (such as entanglement across large distances) or even divergence to infinity and singularities. Yet that is not the case! Further, it assumes that we understand how matter self-organizes in the complexities of biology and its dynamics!

Such assumptions are not congruent with the current level of knowledge we have about the nature of the world i.e., mass, energy, and forces. We have equations that precisely describe the relationship between mass and energy and the relationships between energy and forces but we have no deep understanding of the nature and source of these masses and where the electromagnetic force, for instance, comes from. 

Einstein told us that gravity is the result of the curvature of space-time but nowhere did he describe what is space-time made of so that when it curves it produces a force. 

We know that magnetic fields are present at the atomic scale, but we have no idea where they come from. Further when describing a subatomic particle such as a proton all we can assert is that it is a region of space in which a charge region is strong enough to appear as a particle and we know that atoms themselves which makes up the material world are made of 99.9999999 percent space or mostly space. Even more significant, as a result of the explorations of quantum field theory, we find that the space of the quantum scale is not empty at all but full of electromagnetic fluctuations that we call quantum vacuum energy.

All of this results in the fact that when a materialistic view is taken, in the analysis of a brain for instance, the accuracy of the analysis is only as good as the definition we give to the “material” and at what scale we are considering its involvement. For instance, a neurobiologist who states that cognition is only the result of neuronal interaction in the brain is only considering the dynamics of the relationship of neurons and electrochemical reactions at that scale. The assumption is that the atomic and subatomic scale from which those are constructed is somehow not involved. This would be similar to an astrophysicist observing and attempting to compute the dynamics of a galaxy without considering the stars in it! Or to return to the analogy of our watch it would be like giving an analysis of the movement of the hands of the watch as if the gears and springs that drive them were not involved.

Although the above might appear like a plea against the reductionist materialistic view, it is in fact pointing out that the analysis given by certain neurologists and physicists that consciousness is the summation of all the neuronic activity in the brain, is actually not reductive enough as it does not consider the material dynamics from which the synapses are made at the quantum scales of the atomic and subatomic particles. 

This is where the problem passes from “easy” to a “hard” problem! 

Here, at the quantum scale, wrapping your arms around the analysis of interactions gets much more challenging. In the realm of quantum physics, one must rival with nonlinear interactions such as entanglement at large distances, uncertainties, and divergence, such as the bare mass and bare charge of particles, and most importantly, the Planck scale density of electromagnetic quantum vacuum fluctuations. All of these things are intrinsic to quantum mechanics and have to be considered in the analysis of the material world.

Certainly, intelligence or consciousness has many of the nonlinear attributes one can associate to the quantum realm, and recent experimental evidence, by considering the dynamics of quantum gravity, is emerging demonstrating that non-classical entanglement dynamics may be occurring in the brain. Furthermore, we already know that if we were to achieve true intelligence in some technological developments it will be by means of quantum computing capabilities, which will most likely be vastly different from what we are building in this field today! 

After all, the reason why we are requiring quantum computers, which utilize entanglements and wave functions superposition, to attempt to reproduce the brain capabilities is that the brain itself functions at that scale.

In recent years, new theories of quantum gravity and the nature of forces and mass have emerged describing the energy levels of subatomic particles and forces in terms of pressure gradients in the flow of an underlying field of electromagnetic quantum vacuum fluctuations which can be described as a flow of information. 

These theoretical developments open a door to vast fields of investigations where the brain acts as an antenna tuned into this information flow emerging from the Planck scale of the quantum realm which is driven by a feedback mechanism between the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field of the atomic scale and eventually the biological scale. This feedback feed-forward of information could explain the rapid development of self-organizing systems we observe at the biological scale and the eventual emergence of self-awareness or consciousness from these complex biological structures.

The event of AI development and the interest in the associated fields that it is driving forward have the potential to resolve some of the largest and most important discoveries in human history. As for every groundbreaking technological development, it has the potential to be a great challenge for our civilization and our evolution! 

It is critical, at this time, to consider the ethical and legal ramification of these developments and the future of humanity in this context. 

Thibault Verbiest, in this work, provides remarkable clarity and synthesis, offering essential insights on key questions that should mark any in-depth study on the subject.

in, International Space Federation

The Astounding Mysteries Of The Self & Universe | Physicist Nassim Haramein

Casimir Effect

 Quantum mechanics was born as a result of physicist Max Planck attempting to resolve the empirical black body radiation problem i.e., the electromagnetic emission of a body. 

A black body is an idealized physical body that can absorb all incident light that shines upon it, regardless of its frequency or angle of incidence. This feature also grants it the property of being an ideal perfect thermal radiation or heat emitter. 

Classical theory predicts that when radiated with increasing intensity, such an object will emit an infinite and continuous energy when approaching ultraviolet frequencies, a divergence known as the ultraviolet catastrophe. Experiments with light bulbs, for instance, showed instead that radiance does not go to infinity, it reaches a certain maximum and then decreases.

Planck found that experiments could only be explained if the energy had values which are multiples of an elementary unit hf (where f is the frequency and h is a constant), which opposed the classical assumption of a smooth curve for which emitted energy can have any continuous value. This energy quantization in integers of hf marked the birth of quantum mechanics and introduced one of its fundamental constants, the Planck constant h. 

The resulting Planck's law showed that even at zero Kelvin, oscillations still occur, resulting in what Planck coined zero point energy (ZPE)— or quantum vacuum fluctuations— corresponding to the ground state energy.

The ZPE is responsible for fundamental phenomena of quantum mechanics such as Spontaneous Emission, Lamb Shift, and Casimir Effect. 

Hendrik Casimir predicted that two mirrors in vacuum experience a force that pushes the plates together due to the cavity between the plates eliminating a percentage of the vacuum fluctuations modes between producing an energy gradient resulting in a force. 

This was confirmed experimentally in 1997, and more recently the dynamical Casimir effect and the Casimir torque have allowed direct evidence of the vacuum fluctuations, leaving no doubt of their existence. 

Not only are ZPE responsible for critical quantum effects, they are at the base of the origin of mass and the Nature of Gravity.

Nassim Haramein

How to Attract Anything You Desire | Nassim Haramein & Lewis Howes

Pushing The Envelope of Physics: Nassim Haramein

......................to be self-aware, you have to have feedback

In order to be self-aware, you have to have feedback.
Consciousness is a feedback between the external world and the internal world.
That’s fundamental to ALL things.
So then ALL things are conscious.
All things are feeding information to the vacuum and the vacuum is feeding it back.
The amount that you are able to feed into the system, is related directly to your amount of resistance, in how much information can come in.

– Nassim Haramein

What is Resonance and Why is it so Important?

Linden Gledhill, 

a Philadelphia-based pharmaceutical biochemist 

creates incredible cymatic pattterns with sound, water and light. 

Resonance is experienced, and even identified as the process being responsible for the forms of what we perceive, observe, or infer based on it - an atom, a flower, planets, galaxies -. 

It binds together the different elements that make up physical reality and allows interaction between them. It is the main factor for feedback to be possible, the conduit, shall we say, through which the exchange of information happens: the external can penetrate the internal, and the internal can manifest outside. The condition for that channel to be available, is the coincidence in energy; that the inner and outer energies are compatible. i. e., that they have the same frequency.

In general, we could say that everything around us is vibrating or is vibration. Light or electromagnetic fields is a free propagating vibration in empty space. It is usually depicted as a waveform in 2D, when in reality it moves in 3D following a helical motion, and it is a transverse wave because it vibrates perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the wave (green and red oscillating arrows):

The green and red oscillating vectors are the electric and magnetic component of the wave, respectively.

When the vibration is not happening in empty space, but through a material sample, then the wave is not electromagnetic in nature but mechanical (the atoms themselves are propagating the vibration, they are the wave), known as a sound wave, and its propagation speed will depend on the material of the sample. It will be a longitudinal wave, meaning that the vibration occurs in the direction of propagation of the wave. It has recently been proven that sound waves do carry mass of their own, additionally to the mass that atoms have.

Matter is also vibration, which is confined in a certain volume in space. All objects, even if static, have lots of internal vibrations, its atoms are basically, pure vibration. And the internal modes of vibrations - also known as vibration modes, or normal modes- are particular for each atom, and molecule. These are the fingerprint of the object, it being a quantum particle, such as an atom, or a tennis ball, or a planet, or a star.   

Each object has its fingerprint, which are its own modes of vibration. These are defined by its geometry and atomic/molecular composition. For example, if we take a simple molecule of water, composed one oxygen and two hydrogen atoms, its normal modes of vibration are depicted in the video below:

                     

When an external vibration (remember that energy has an oscillation or vibration associated with it, with frequency f) strikes the object, if that vibration (frequency) coincides with any of the object's modes of vibration (which have their frequency as well), the object will absorb that energy and that normal mode of vibration will amplify its amplitude (it will vibrate more intensely, analogous to higher sea wave amplitude).

This principle is what makes, for example, that a glass vessel breaks when some acoustic vibration around it coincides with any of the normal or proper modes of vibration of the glass, so that if the volume (intensity of the sound) is high enough, the glass will absorb that more energy, its atoms will have more kinetic energy that is amplified by this resonant condition, until the glass breaks (loses its shape, unable to withstand so much internal energy amplified by the external).

Likewise, an object that is made to vibrate (it does so at its own frequencies or modes of vibration), can stimulate the vibration of any other object around it that has some mode of vibration that matches its own, as the video below shows:

                     

Sound is, therefore, consequence of resonance.

Cymatics is a perfect example of how these resonances may be observed in nature. Cymatics is a subset of modal vibrational phenomena; it makes sound patters visible, therefore, it is the study of visible sound and vibration. 

And when combining sound or matter vibrations, and light vibrations, incredible cymatic patters are created.

Color, too, is another consequence of resonance. To explain the nature of color, we first would have to address some quantum mechanics concepts.

  

The simplest known atom, the hydrogen, is mainly composed of a proton and an electron, where both are basically confined vibrations at different frequencies, also known as normal modes of vibrations. This means that they are allowed to vibrate only at certain frequencies, defined by quantum mechanics. Their vibrations are “quantized”. Meanwhile, white light propagating electromagnetic oscillations, contains all frequencies of the visible spectrum, therefore, when it reaches the hydrogen atom, only parts of the electromagnetic spectrum can be absorbed by the atom, and it becomes “excited”. This excitation lasts very short time, it decays almost immediately, and the energies emitted by the atom can also be detected. This is known as the emission spectra of the hydrogen atom.

There are two ways in which one can measure the spectra, or fingerprint of the interaction between light and the atom: from the perspective of the frequencies of light that are missing from the original after they have been absorbed by the atom (upper section in the figure below), the resulting spectra is known as absorption spectra of hydrogen atom, or, by measuring the emission spectra of the excited atom. Both spectra are almost the negative one of other one, except that there are very small energy loses as heat, during the de excitation of the atom, and hence the energy emitted is smaller than the absorbed, its frequency is a little smaller; it shifts the spectrum a little, almost unperceivable bit, to the red side, i.e., to larger wavelengths.

  

The spectrum is particular for each atom, it is the fingerprint of each atom. The scientific technique that measures the spectra of elements is known as spectroscopy, and it allows to determine the chemical composition -atomic and molecular- of everything around us. Molecules also have their own fingerprint (which is more complex than for the atom, because there are many more modes of vibrations involved), because it can be decomposed in the different vibrations coming from its bonded atoms.

One of the most beautiful ways of looking at the periodic table, is thought the emission spectra of the elements, where we can confirm that effectively, each have their own spectra.

  

Spectroscopy is a technology based on quantum mechanics, and it is not only empolyed to determine the chemical composition in samples, but as well it is the main tool to know the chemical environment in astronomical objects, such as our Sun, and the atomic composition in the different layers of the Sun.

  

  

The black lines in Sun’s absorption spectrum are caused by gases helium, hydrogen, oxygen, on or above Sun’s surface that absorb some of the emitted light. Every gas has a very specific set of frequencies that it absorbs.

If a gas is heated to the point where it glows, the resulting spectrum has light at discrete wavelengths that turn out to match the wavelengths of missing light in stellar spectra. Therefore, by studying the spectra of various elements in a laboratory here on Earth, we can determine the composition of the distant stars, galaxies, and beyond!

It is curious that the Sun emission spectra can be considered a black body radiation spectra, as the figure below shows:

Diagram from Comin's Discovering the Universe

Nassim Haramein remarks that the Sun and a black hole, are both black body radiators, and that alone hints into the hidden nature of stars.

“It should be noted that a black hole is a perfect black body, as is the sun. This fact is important in the context of Unified Physics Theory”. 

Nassim Haramein

Very important studies have shed light on the now irrevocable fact that black holes in the center of galaxies are playing a predominant role in the galaxy formation, event that would explain why astronomers and astrophysicists have found a black hole in the center of galaxies.

Astronomers have observed supermassive black holes creating star-forming regions. Since 2017 a team of astrophysicists have been observing supermassive black holes, and the possibility that these entities could be birthing stars, finding evidence of new star birth from material being ejected from the black hole, called an outflow. An outflow of gas could be responsible for creating new stars by swirling around the center of the black hole, in something called an accretion disc. The possibility that the star formation happens in the accretion disk of the black hole was supported by observations.

Using the Hubble Space Telescope to observe and carry out spectroscopy on a dwarf galaxy Hen 2-10 (which is about 34 million light years away from Earth, in the constellation Pyxis), Schutte and his team conclude that the black-hole outflow in the center of the galaxy triggered the star formation of the galaxy, and their findings were published in Nature.

Stephen Adler, at Princeton University in New Jersey, has developed a new theory based on an interaction between black holes and the dark energy which provides a mechanism that could explain how a central black hole can catalyze star formation. This interaction with dark energy would cause black holes to leak matter creating a wind of particles that stream away.

“When this wind collides with infalling matter, the momentum cancels out leaving the products of the collision a certain distance from the black hole. It is this matter that then forms into stars.”  

The Physics arXiv Blog.

If black holes do emit a “wind” in the way that Adler proposes, astronomers could see evidence of it, using the James Webb Space Telescope. And just some days ago, a new study with observational data is supporting this view. The study finds that in fact, black hole growth and star formation are happening concurrently in the same galaxies and they do seem to be influencing each other. They also calculate the ratio that describes how the two phenomena are linked, and this is very important in the context of Unified physics because it proves that the connection between stars and black holes go is even deeper.

How deep can the relation go? 

Haramein’s coming paper, Invariant Unification of Forces, Fields and Particles, in a Quantum Vacuum Plasma, is addressing this as well! 

As Haramein has affirmed for more than 25 years, stars are black holes with a thick ergosphere, which is why the spectra of a black body (a black hole) and a star, are so similar.

From all of the above, we can see that the notion of Resonance is so important, elemental and Foundational, that our foundation establishes it as a Basic Principle. 

Resonance guides all our studies: the Generalized Holographic Principle, the Holofractographic Scaling Model, the Science Quantum Biology, the Science of Consciousness, and much more ... 

Inés Urdaneta

A person can create their own reality...partially correct

Jossuha Théophile

 

There is a concept that a person can create their your own reality. 

This concept is only partially correct because it is generally discussed in a one-way manner i.e., a person sending a message to the field with a request/intention/prayer desiring an outcome. 

This is only ½ of the loop. 

The wave you’re sending is the feed-forward part of the loop. 

You need to realize that the wave coming back is the feed-back which is the rest of the universe creating its reality and responding to you. 

The universe (Planck Field or ”the Divine”) interacts with the rest of humanity and your creation and the universe gives you a result that is a combination of everyone’s feed-forward waves. 

If a person could create a reality exactly the way they wanted it, a few things would happen: 

1) you would be the only one in it because everybody else would be creating their own. It would be very lonely.  

2) you’d also be bored within seconds since you had everything you wanted. 

What happens is that you put your intention out into the field and you stay open to what comes back, realizing it’s going to get modified for the highest evolution of the whole. 

This unexpected feed-back gives you empathy for yourself and others. 

You might not get exactly what you expected but now you’re learning from the experience. 

The totality of everyone’s learning is how the universe learns about itself. 

Nassim Haramein

The Torus

The traditional standard model description of a black hole says that they suck in everything around them, (even light) and that nothing except a small amount of radiation (Hawking radiation) is able to escape, leading them to eventually "evaporate", which causes a major issue called the "information paradox".

If we know that energy has to be conserved (that is, it can't ever be destroyed, that it only change state) then where does all the energy (mass) that falls into a black hole go?

Nassim Haramein's holofractographic model for the universe revises the model of black holes by modifying the topology of space-time dynamics and structure. Rather than a black hole being described as being like a funnel curving down to a point (singularity), Nassim describes black holes as having the shape and dynamics of a Torus, which allows information to both implode and expand from the central singularity. Instead of information getting sucked in and disappearing forever to who knows where, black holes are described as both radiating objects as well as imploding “holes”. This change was made by Nassim by adding in the dynamics of spin (torque and Coriolis forces) into Albert Einstein’s relativistic field equations.

In this model, the universal topology of space-time (black holes on all scales) is described as a rotating dual torus which is expanding and contracting on itself continuously. As space-time curves towards the centering singularity, it also curls like water going down the drain. Rather than describing gravity using using the analogy of a ball on a (flat) trampoline, Nassim's new model describes gravity for what it is, a curling dynamic that happens in a "3D" space-time manifold, not on a "flat" surface.

This curling of the space-time manifold at all scales is the mechanical source of spin at all scales from atoms to planets to stars to galaxies etc. Matter on all scales is spinning because the space that defines the matter is spinning itself. As space-time curls towards singularity it approaches the speed of light, generating enormous centrifugal forces, which in turn causes expansion. The expansion of space-time is eventually overpowered by the curvature of space-time and contracts back towards the singularity again, keeping the process in perpetual motion.

It is the continuous process of space-time implosion and expansion that produces the forces of gravity and electromagnetism. The gravitational field is generated as space-time curls towards the singularity in the center of the system and electromagnetic spectrum is produced when the centrifugal forces of spin at the event horizon (which are close to the speed of light near the singularity), cause it to expand and radiate.

Prior to Nassim Haramein's holofractographic model, the source of all spin in the universe was unexplained other than to say that all spin started with the Big Bang and that everything in the universe has been spinning continuously in space-time since then due to the initial momentum gained in the Big Bang (ready for this?) "in a frictionless environment" (!).

With Nassim Haramein's addition of torque and spin into Einstein’s field equations, he generates a new, much more coherent model that unifies the forces of spin, electromagnetism and gravity using the most foundational topology of space-time on all scales: the torus.


in, Resonance Sciense Foundation

The Physics of Spirituality | Nassim Haramein with Vishen Lakhiani

3 primary expressions of form

If you want to describe the entire universe in one unified field theory, you have to describe in great detail, the one thing that is found everywhere in the universe on all scales from infinitely large to infinitely small: SPACE.

Nassim Haramein describes the vacuum of space geometrically and mathematically through 3 primary expressions of form:

• Scalar vector geometries (cube octahedron)
• Flow dynamics (the Torus)
• Field patterning (Spin, Phi & Fibonacci)

Torus

O Torus, ou padrão primário, é uma dinâmica de energia que parece um donut - é uma superfície contínua com um buraco nele. A energia flui através de um fim, circula ao redor do centro e sai do outro lado. Você pode vê-lo em todo o lado - em átomos, células, sementes, flores, árvores, animais, humanos, furacões, planetas, sóis, galáxias e até mesmo o cosmos como um todo. 
Nassim Haramein

Infinite fractal octaves of vacuum geometry on all scales, octaves of vector equilibrium.

A tetrahedral array expresses the geometry of both expansion and contraction. A star tetrahedron is made from 8 tetrahedrons pointing out, while the cube octahedron is made from 8 tetrahedrons pointing in.

8 star tetrahedrons put together forms a 64 tetrahedron grid, the fewest number of tetrahedrons needed to form 2 octaves of perfectly balanced cube octahedron geometries nested inside each-other: the first iteration of what becomes infinite fractal octaves of vacuum geometry on all scales, octaves of vector equilibrium.

Nassim Haramein

........................................ fractal codes

“There are fractal codes containing the laws of creation and the more we understand these laws the more we can apply the harmony that is apparent in nature as a more powerful force in our own lives. There is truth and purity in natural things and our contact with them nourishes the soul and illumines the mind”. 

Jonathan Quintin

The wisdom of the Universe - Interview with Nassim Haramein

.................................the structure of space

Since time is distance in space, time is memory on the structure of space. Without memory, there is no time. Without time, there is no memory. It then follows that the energy that we perceive as the material world must be information, or energy on the structure of space. 
– Nassim Haramein

Planet Frequencies

cymaglyphs created from the fundamental resonant tones of the planets

Cymatics is the study of visible sound and vibration. By sending sound waves through matter such as sand on a plate a cornstarch and water mixture, various geometric patterns emerge depending on the frequency and amplitude of the sound being played. 

Nassim Haramein

Create your own reality...This is only ½ of the loop

There is a concept that a person can create their your own reality.
This concept is only partially correct because it is generally discussed in a one-way manner i.e., a person sending a message to the field with a request/intention/prayer desiring an outcome.

This is only ½ of the loop.
The wave you’re sending is the feed-forward part of the loop.

You need to realize that the wave coming back is the feed-back which is the rest of the universe creating its reality and responding to you.

The universe (Planck Field or ”the Divine”) interacts with the rest of humanity and your creation and the universe gives you a result that is a combination of everyone’s feed-forward waves.

If a person could create a reality exactly the way they wanted it, a few things would happen:
1) you would be the only one in it because everybody else would be creating their own. It would be very lonely.
2) you’d also be bored within seconds since you had everything you wanted. What happens is that you put your intention out into the field and you stay open to what comes back, realizing it’s going to get modified for the highest evolution of the whole. This unexpected feed-back gives you empathy for yourself and others. You might not get exactly what you expected but now you’re learning from the experience.

The totality of everyone’s learning 

is how the universe learns about itself. 

Nassim Haramein

Memory

Memory

 is not a function of the brain directly, 

but is a function of the brain 

accessing the information in the vacuum. 

So the brain is like a radio.

– Nassim Haramein

There is a fundamental field of information

that is the source of our consciousness. 

Consciousness 

is not an epiphenomenon of your brain, 

it's actually 

something that your brain is tuned into 

like a radio is tuned to a set of information.

 – Nassim Haramein

What would happen if we got rid of the divisions?