sábado, 17 de outubro de 2026

Phase One


Alexander Krivitskiy






For leaving the fridge open
last night, I forgive you.
For conjuring white curtains
instead of living your life.

For the seedlings that wilt, now,
in tiny pots, I forgive you.
For saying no first
but yes as an afterthought.

I forgive you for hideous visions
after childbirth, brought on by loss
of sleep. And when the baby woke
repeatedly, for your silent rebuke

in the dark, “What’s your beef?”
I forgive your letting vines
overtake the garden. For fearing
your own propensity to love.

For losing, again, your bag
en route from San Francisco;
for the equally heedless drive back
on the caffeine-fueled return.

I forgive you for leaving
windows open in rain
and soaking library books
again. For putting forth

only revisions of yourself,
with punctuation worked over,
instead of the disordered truth,
I forgive you. For singing mostly

when the shower drowns
your voice. For so admiring
the drummer you failed to hear
the drum. In forgotten tin cans,

may forgiveness gather. Pooling
in gutters. Gushing from pipes.
A great steady rain of olives
from branches, relieved

of cruelty and petty meanness.
With it, a flurry of wings, thirteen
gray pigeons. Ointment reserved
for healers and prophets. I forgive you.

I forgive you. For feeling awkward
and nervous without reason.
For bearing Keats’s empty vessel
with such calm you worried

you had, perhaps, no moral
center at all. For treating your mother
with contempt when she deserved
compassion. I forgive you. I forgive

you. I forgive you. For growing
a capacity for love that is great
but matched only, perhaps,
by your loneliness. For being unable

to forgive yourself first so you
could then forgive others and
at last find a way to become
the love that you want in this world.




 Dilruba Ahmed




 

The Body Remembers. Can It Forgive?




Krm Carmen



The body remembers 
what the mind cannot. 
On forgiving our own parts, 
forgiveness before justice, and 
what hoʻoponopono and lōkahi teach 
about restoring balance.





Remembering is the healing
We have been handed a mechanic’s idea of healing. 
Something broke. Find the part. Fix it. 
Return to how you were before.

Twenty-five years of sitting with people at the edge of what they could bear has taught me a different story. 

Healing begins with remembering — with the mind when it can, and with the body, which kept the record when the mind could not.

Then comes troost — that beautiful Dutch word for ‘comfort’ that English never quite holds. 
A troost-ing hug. 
A troost-ing warm room, blanked or cuppa tea. 
Someone who stays.

Then grief — for what happened, and for everything that never got to happen.

Then forgiveness.

And then the quiet, unglamorous courage of standing exactly where you are — scarred, softened, a little wiser — and taking the next step from here. You walk on as the one you have become.


The body remembers
Some memories arrive as stories. Others arrive as a tightening throat, a sudden chill, a heart that races when someone raises their voice in the next room. 
No words. Just the body, saying this again.

Psychology calls this implicit memory.

The amygdala — the brain’s early-warning centre — matures long before the hippocampus, which files our experiences into time and narrative. So what happened to us before we had language, or in moments too overwhelming to process, is often stored as sensation and reflex.

Stress hormones press those imprints in deeper. 
Years later, a smell or a tone of voice opens the file, and the thinking brain quietly goes offline while the body prepares to fight, flee or freeze.

This is what Bessel van der Kolk meant when he wrote that the body keeps the score. 
It is why Peter Levine, Pat Ogden and so many somatic clinicians ad workers, including myself — work with sensation and movement too, rather than words alone. 

Talking about the wound matters. The body also needs to finish the gesture it was never allowed to complete — and to learn, slowly, that the danger has passed.

The Hawaiian teachers and elders I am learning from would not find any of this surprising. In their tradition, thought and feeling both rise from the naʻau — the gut, the viscera. Truth is something you feel right there. 
And when a body falls ill while a family carries unspoken conflict, the illness is read as a message that something between people, ancestors and land has fallen out of balance.


Forgiving the body
Here is something I hear in my practice frequently: 
‘How do I connect to my body, and — trust my body again?’ 
or something like: 
‘My body betrayed me…’

It froze when it should have run. 
It went numb. 
It left myself. 
It said YES when everything in you meant NO. 
It got sick, gained weight, stopped bleeding, stopped sleeping, kept shaking long after the danger was gone.

And so we turn away from the very home we live in — unconsiously, for years. 
We punish it, override it, ignore its signals, treat it as the accomplice to what was done to us, oftentimes without consciously realizing or choosing to do this.

Polyvagal theory gives us a gentle explaination. 
Freeze and collapse are ancient survival intelligence — the nervous system choosing the response most likely to keep you alive when fighting or fleeing was impossible.

Your body did what it could.
It got you here.
Forgiving the body is an embodied act.

It happens below thought for example:

  • Place your hand where the old story still lives — throat, belly, chest, jaw…
  • Invite the breath to that place without needing it to change.
  • Say to yourself, softly: ‘You did what you could. You kept me alive’.
  • Allow whatever wants to move — trembling, warmth, tears, a long exhale. This is grief finding its way out through the tissues.
  • Stay until something softens, even slightly. Then stop.

In IFS language, we are thanking the protectors — the parts that braced, numbed and froze — and releasing them from a job they took on far too young. Something unwinds when the body is no longer held as the culprit. Often, that is when the deeper forgiveness becomes possible at all.



An unpopular opinion: forgiveness before justice
I will say it plainly, knowing it may sting. For healing, justice matters less than we think.

Boundaries — yes. Absolutely, fiercely, yes. Protection from people who harm you, and from those who would harm others — yes. 
Courts, accountability, consequences — these belong in a just society, and some of us will rightly spend years fighting for them.

And still. When our healing waits for the other person to admit, apologise, pay, or finally be seen for what they did, we hand them the key to our own recovery. The hunger to be proven right — the Dutch have a good word for wanting to get even, terugpakken — keeps the nervous system in fight mode. It keeps the story alive and the body braced. We stay tied to the one who hurt us, often for decades, or even generations.

Forgiveness asks nothing of them. 
They never have to know, and you never have to let them back in.

A caution, because I have seen forgiveness used as a weapon: it cannot be forced, and it cannot be rushed. Forgiveness that are only words, that skips remembering, feelings and grief is a bypass — and the body will know. In the tradition I turn to next, 
forgiveness only counts when it comes from the heart. 

The order matters. 
  1. Remember. 
  2. Comfort. 
  3. Grieve. 
  4. Then forgive.



Hoʻoponopono — making things right
I want to be careful here, because this is not my tradition. 
What follows is what I am learning from Native Hawaiian elders and authors — above all from my teacher, Kumu Kawika Forster, a 51st-generation teacher from Molokaʻi, and from the teachings of Mary Kawena Pukui, known with love as Tūtū Pukui, recorded in Nānā i ke Kumu (”Look to the Source”) with Dr. E.W. Haertig and Catherine Lee in 1972, and carried forward by the Liliʻuokalani Trust, Aunty Malia Craver, and Aunty Lynette and Uncle Likeke Paglinawan. 

The authors of the third volume are clear: any teaching of hoʻoponopono that is not grounded first in Hawaiian culture, through a Hawaiian practitioner, is misappropriation. 
I honour that. I share this as a student, to point you toward the source.

Hoʻoponopono means, roughly, to set right. 
Traditionally it is a family conference, guided by a respected elder or practitioner — the haku — and held when conflict, illness or unspoken hurt has disturbed the household. 
It came close to disappearing after missionaries branded it heathen; 
Tūtū Pukui spent decades bringing it back.


The stages she described unfold roughly like this:

1. Pule — an opening prayer, asking God and the ancestors to guide everyone present. 
 
2. Kūkulu kumuhana — pooling the family’s strength toward a shared purpose, and naming the problem. Everyone must truly agree to take part. 
 
3. Mahiki — peeling back the layers, like bark from a tree or the skins of an onion, until the real hurt is reached. 
 
4. Hoʻomalu — silence, called by the haku whenever tempers flare or people need to turn inward. 
 
5. Self-scrutiny and discussion — each person looking honestly at their own part, guided by the haku’s questions. 
 
6. Mihi, kala and ʻoki — repenting, forgiving and releasing, and cutting the entanglement loose. 
 
7. Pule hoʻopau — a closing prayer. 
 
8. Pani — sharing food together, in a spirit cleared of grudges.


What strikes me most is how mutual it is. 
In the case story the Paglinawans tell, a young woman’s swollen eye leads her family into hoʻoponopono. The relatives who had been dodging their share of the household work apologise. So do her parents, for not speaking up. And so does she — for letting resentment harden into a grudge. Everyone owns their thread of the knot. Then everyone releases everyone, and the hurt is sent, in Aunty Lynette’s image, into the deep blue ocean, never to rise again.

Truth sits at the centre. The Hawaiian word ʻoiaʻiʻo means the flesh of truth — truth you feel in the naʻau. It must be told fully, and without any wish to wound.

And notice ʻoki. Tūtū Pukui describes how, when a relationship truly could not be restored, a formal and clean break was made. 
Boundaries were never foreign to this tradition. Release can mean reconciliation. It can also mean a clear, held, respectful ending.




The lōkahi triangle, adapted from Kaʻiulani Duponte (2010), 
as presented in Nānā i ke Kumu, Volume III (Liliʻuokalani Trust).



Lōkahi — the triangle of balance
At the heart of the Hawaiian worldview sits lōkahi — unity, harmony, balance. 
It is drawn as a triangle. 
At its peak, Akua and nā ʻaumākua: God, the gods, the ancestral guardians. 
At one corner of its base, kānaka — humankind. 
At the other, ʻāina, moana and lani — land, sea and sky. 
Lōkahi lives in the centre, holding all three in relationship.

On the most isolated inhabited islands on earth, there was nowhere to run from a conflict and no margin for waste. The ancestors replanted what they harvested. They netted only the fish the family needed and shared the catch. When gathering feathers for a coat, they plucked only what was needed and let the bird fly free. Harmony with people, ancestors and land was survival/ living itself.

A person whose naʻau, mind and body are aligned is pono — in right relationship. 
Hurt, grief, stress, or failing to carry one’s part leaves a person out of balance, and that imbalance ripples outward — into the family, toward the ancestors, into the community and the land.

This is why I keep lōkahi. (Fun fact: this is a word I tattood on my arm).

Most Western trauma work tends one corner of the triangle — the individual, sometimes the family. 

Lōkahi reminds us that a wound is also a rupture with the sacred and with the earth, and the mending has to reach there too. A hand in the soil. Salt water. A prayer to those who came before. These are medicine for the other two corners. This is at the heart of Terrapy, the name I gave my ways of working, now you may start to understand more and more why.




Why you won’t find the four phrases here

I am sorry
Please forgive me
Thank you
I love you

If you have searched ‘hoʻoponopono’ online, you have met the four-line mantra — four short phrases of apology, forgiveness, gratitude and love, repeated silently to clean the subconscious. It is everywhere: on YouTube, on Instagram, in self-help courses that promise a ‘frequency reset.’ 
I have chosen to leave it out of this article, and I want to tell you why.

Here is why:
  • It comes from a different lineage. The mantra grew out of a modern, individualised adaptation of hoʻoponopono, developed in the late twentieth century and spread worldwide through Ihaleakala Hew Len and Joe Vitale’s 2007 book Zero Limits. It has its own history. It is a long way from the family practice Tūtū Pukui documented, with its haku, its circle, its prayers and its shared meal.
  • The keepers of the tradition have asked us to stop. The elders writing in Nānā i ke Kumu name teaching of hoʻoponopono cut loose from Hawaiian culture as misappropriation and exploitation. My own kumu, Kawika Forster, is just as clear about this. Tūtū Pukui herself grieved how the practice had come back in fragments and grafted-on inventions. When a people tell us how they want their sacred practice handled, listening is the least we can do.
  • It skips the hard middle. The traditional process asks for truth told in full, layers peeled back, each person owning their part, silence when needed — and only then, release. A mantra repeated alone in your room can leap straight to love and gratitude while the anger and grief are still waiting at the door. Tūtū Pukui warned that without sincerity from the heart, the ritual becomes form without substance.
  • For trauma survivors, it can wound. Asking someone who was harmed to apologise, again and again, for the pain they carry risks folding self-blame back into the very place we are trying to heal. And there is something my kumu taught me that I keep returning to. Once the pōhaku — the stone — has been released, we stop speaking of it. That need not mean it can never be mentioned again. It does warn against reciting the same words over the same wound, day after day — a habit that keeps hauling the stone back up from the deep blue ocean. Mantra japa, the devotional repetition of sacred sound, has its own place and purpose, and I will write about it separately. It is a very different practice, held for a very different reason.

So I offer you the tradition’s essence — truth, mutual accountability, release, restored relationship — and an invitation to learn it from the people who carry it, like kumu Kawika Forster 




Standing where you are
I am not Hawaiian, and I will not teach you hoʻoponopono, my teacher will. 
What it has taught me is that, 
we heal in relationship — with each other, with those who came before us (the ancestors), and with the land that holds us. 
We heal by telling the truth, owning our part, and letting go of what we were never meant to carry forever.

 
Some questions to sit with, slowly, perhaps with a hand on your belly:

Where in my body do I still hold the case against myself?

Whose apology am I still waiting for — and what does the waiting cost me? (Such a common topic in therapy!)

What part of this knot is mine to own?

Which grief have I not yet allowed?

Who, in my life, could hold a circle of truth with me?

What would one small step look like, from exactly here?



And some for the harder middle — truth and kuleana. 
A gentle word first: 
owning your part never means carrying what was done to you. That weight was never yours.

What is the truth I have not yet said out loud — even to myself?

Where have I told the story in a way that keeps me safe from my own part in it?

If my naʻau (gut) could speak, what would it say about this?

What did I do, or leave undone, that added to the hurt?

What would it ask of me to say I’m sorry — and mean it all the way down?

What promise have I broken, to someone else or to myself?

What am I still holding onto because letting go would mean admitting I was part of it?



Go gently. If the old story is heavy, do this work with someone beside you — a therapist, a trusted elder, a circle. Healing was never meant to happen alone.

  1. Remember. 
  2. Find comfort. 
  3. Grieve. 
  4. Forgive — the body first. 

Accept where you stand. 
And then, with whatever courage you have today, move.






Anneke Sips
in, Wisdom of Psychosis




quinta-feira, 15 de outubro de 2026

The Shape of Silence


R.R. Leone






It never begins loudly.
No slammed doors.
No thunder of words.

Just a pause
that lasts
longer than it should.

At first you tell yourself
they just need space.
Everyone needs space.
So you wait.

But the quiet stretches.
Minutes become hours.
Hours become something heavier.

You replay the last conversation
like a physician studying scans,
searching for the fracture
you might have missed.

Was it that sentence?
That question?
The look on your face when you spoke?

The mind becomes a detective
in a crime scene of memory.

Meanwhile the room fills
with a silence that has weight.
The phone stays dark.
No message. No explanation.
Just absence.

And the strange part is
how silence changes the body.
Your breath grows shallow.
Thoughts circle faster.

The nervous system begins to signal
something it cannot name.
Not anger. Not grief.
Something closer to panic.

Like slipping beneath water
and realizing
no one else noticed.

At first you tread carefully.
You assume air will come back.
A word. A message. A sign of life.

But the surface keeps moving farther away.
And the quiet grows deeper.

You begin to understand something
no one ever teaches you about love.

Connection is oxygen.

And when it disappears suddenly,
the mind does what bodies do underwater:
it fights.
It searches.
It reaches upward for something
that isn't there.

Eventually the conversation returns.
Or it doesn't.
But by then something has changed.

Because silence, once introduced,
leaves a mark.
Not a wound you can see.

Just the memory
of how long you held your breath
before realizing
you were swimming alone.



R.R. Leone



 

Self-Accountability in Relationships. Own your part in the story. Honor your reality

kieferpix/iStock




How do you own your part without letting go of what you know to be true?

Owning your part is an act of humility, and that gesture opens the door for your partner to reciprocate, to meet you in an honest place.




Every story comes with multiple storytellers. 
And yet, not every narrator has an equally large share of the story to tell. 

Couples claim one of two roles—the sinner or the saint. 
One arrives with a long list of transgressions to share, the other absorbs the blame.
One partner becomes the storyteller, the one who gives the history: how they met, how it used to be, and how they ended up in this office. 
The other will sit, reluctantly listening to the balance sheet of their mistakes and shortcomings.

‍For this person, therapy can feel like a punishment for their actions and their last shot to fix things. They’ll sit there and take it or occasionally interject to correct the record. But mostly, the therapist will witness the dynamic they’ve seen hundreds of times before. 
In couples, it’s the sinner and the saint. 
In polycules, it’s the weak link in the chain and everyone else pulling weight. 
The deep issues that bring clients into therapy, however, rarely lie at the feet of one person alone.

‍Relationship dynamics go beyond the binary of perpetrator and victim, powerful and powerless, betrayed and betrayer—the accountant and the accountable. 

Recognizing that all parties are a piece of the pie does not mean that everyone’s slice is the same size and made up of the same ingredients. But owning your part is essential to breaking through impasses.

The other side of that breakthrough begins when each person freely shares what they are doing differently with the intention to improve things, rather than doggedly focusing on the change they need from their partner. 

This is how therapists know they’re getting somewhere. 
Their job is not to act as judge, jury, and executioner. 
It’s to help the clients navigate how people in love can behave in unloving ways—and how they can carve a new path.

But the issues that bring people into the room rarely sit at one person’s feet. 
And in recognizing what your own part consists of, big or small, you also open the door for conversation and connection. It’s often hard to do, it requires humility. But when you show up in this way, you invite the other person to meet you with similar honesty and reflection.

This does not mean that you have to refute your version of what you know to be true. 
Owning your part does not require rejecting your experience of events. Rather the two can be held together: 
I take ownership of this element of the dynamic. And what happened to me, what I felt was real.

You can be honest about your share in a story without handing over the pen. 
This goes for romantic relationships, as well as ones with friends, family members, and colleagues. Listen to what you know to be true and practice grace—for yourself, maybe for another. 

In that can be the foundation for healing.


Own your part in the story. Honor your reality
You do everything you can think of to make it work: 
You craft every text perfectly. 
You aren’t too eager or too distant. 
You read the self-help books. 
You work on yourself. 

Still, here you are thinking, 
“Why am I giving so much and getting so little?”
If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone. 
I often hear from people who feel like it’s their responsibility to make a relationship last beyond the first few dates or even last a lifetime. They tie themselves in knots to make it work. And if it doesn’t, they blame themselves for not doing (or being) enough.

But in relationships, this self-blame doesn’t lead to greater satisfaction or happiness. 
Self-accountability, however, does. 
By taking responsibility for your own feelings, experiences, and expectations, you make it easier to invite another person to do the same—and increase the likelihood that you both get what you desire.

Here’s what this might look like in practice:

  1. Instead of doing things you don’t love, you say: “I’m not a big sports fan. Why don’t you watch the game with friends tonight and I’ll do my own thing? I’d love to watch that movie I’ve had on my list with you tomorrow. I think we’ll both like it!”
  2. Instead of waiting to know where you stand, you ask: “Hi! I had a great time on our date and I’d love to see you again next week. Since you haven’t texted back, I’m hoping you can let me know if you just don’t feel the same. It’s better to know than to wonder, and easy communication is really important to me. Thanks!”
  3. Instead of hoping they’ll read your mind, you share: “I love when you bring me little gifts from your work trips. It lets me know you’re thinking of me even when we’re apart. What’s something that makes you feel thought of?”

When you engage in self-accountability, you release the urge to control how the other person will respond. Instead, you’re owning your experience, then making an invitation. 
You’re saying, 
“This is where I am. Where are you?” 

It’s possible they won’t accept it or reciprocate, but by practicing self-accountability, you’re opening the door for both of you to move forward in honest conversation—together.



Now let’s turn the lens on you:

  1. What’s one feeling, experience, or expectation you might not be fully owning?
  2. If you were to practice self-accountability and share this truth, what invitation might you make with it? 

If you’re not used to owning your part so directly, this might feel intimidating. 
But whether or not you decide to share your answers, responding to these questions truthfully is the first step toward greater self-accountability.



Your Partner Will Practice Self-Accountability When You Do
Owning your part is an act of humility, and that gesture opens the door for your partner to reciprocate, to meet you in an honest place. Your apology lessens the shame on the other to do the same. And while you may feel that your missteps pale in comparison to those of your partner’s, they might not feel the same way. 

Taking accountability for yourself does not excuse the other person. 
It helps them see that apologizing for their mistake doesn’t mean that they are a mistake. 
If you can do it, perhaps they can, too. ‍

‍If you have been wounded by your partner time and time again, accepting any kind of responsibility can feel like losing ground in an endless battle to prove you deserve better. But even the phrase “can’t you see how you’re hurting me?” is likely to trigger a defensive response that throws the responsibility back on you. “Yes, but I never would have slept with them if you had shown any interest in me whatsoever.” ‍

If you say to your partner “you never thank me,” you are all but ensuring that future thank-yous will become obligatory rather than heartfelt and sincere. 
Instead, consider saying 
“I love supporting you and your gratitude is really important to me.”‍

If you are aghast at how your typically responsible mate lost your shared money, have you asked if 
  1. They felt financial pressure to take care of you? 
  2. Did the desire to give the children a successful start empty the bank account? 
  3. What’s the larger context? 
  4. And what is your part in it? 

This is not victim blaming; this is acknowledging the inherent complexities of what it means to be responsible in your relationship. 




Practices for Self-Accountability
Try one or more…

  • Own your experience. You can describe your experience as a consequence of the other’s actions, but pay attention to the language you use. Trade out “you made me feel” for “you did not acknowledge me and then I felt rejected.” 
  • Stop punishing. Do you want to hurt them or do you want both of you to be able to learn from this and move on in your relationship together?
  • Make a choice: if you want to continue the relationship, make that choice. 
  • Prioritize clarity and expectation setting. As the PREP program teaches, be specific about what happened and how you felt using X, Y, Z statements: “when you did X in situation Y, I felt Z.”  ex: “When you thank everybody for helping you with this big project, and you don’t mention me at all, it makes me feel that you don’t recognize my contributions or value—staying home with the kids, taking care of the house, while you did your thing.”
  • Practice differentiation. It involves identifying and clarifying your thoughts, feelings, and desires while being open and curious about your partner’s. It’s the ability to simultaneously experience connection and autonomy and not personalize their autonomy as a rejection of you.
  • Ask them about their experience. Be curious about the context of their behavior. Demonstrate empathy. 
  • Separate the behavior from the person. “We both know what you did was bad but I don’t view you as a bad person.”
  • Beware of “Fundamental Attribution Error.” In stressed relationships, we tend to see our behavior as circumstantial and their behavior as characterological. We’re black and white about others and nuanced about ourselves. 
  • When we’re in a bad mood, it’s because we had a bad day. When they’re in a bad mood, it’s because they’re not a nice person. 
  • Use humor. If you find the right tone, humor can be helpful for owning your part and diffusing tension. 
  • Practice grace. You can be so mad at your partner or so mad at yourself. It doesn’t mean the whole house has to come down. Practicing grace is the acknowledgement that you don’t condone what has happened but you keep room for redemption and healing. 




Esther Perel





terça-feira, 13 de outubro de 2026

Each Moment Is Precious



BriBar
The English Lake District, Keswick, Cumbria, UK






Live in the moment,
Just take it all in.
Pay attention to everything,
Right there and right then.

Don’t let your mind wander
To what’s coming next.
Cherish this moment
And give it your best.

Don’t let tomorrow
Make you rush through today,
Or too many great moments
Will just go to waste.

And the person you’re with,
In that moment you share,
Give them all of your focus;
Be totally there.

Laugh till it hurts,
Let the tears drop.
Fill up each moment
With all that you’ve got.

Don’t miss the details;
The lesson is there.
Don’t get complacent;
Stay sharp and aware.

It can take but a moment
To change your life’s path.
And once it ticks by,
There is no going back.

In just 60 seconds,
You may make a new friend.
Find your true love,
Or see a life start or end.

You become who you are
In those moments you live.
And the growth’s not in taking
But in how much you give.

Life is just moments,
So precious and few.
Whether valued or squandered,
It’s all up to you!




Patricia Fleming



 

How to Find Your Purpose Through Stoicism

 

StockCake






Learn to examine who you are and 
listen to the signals inside 
to find your path.




Purpose is one of those questions that does not resolve itself by being ignored. You can stay busy for years, fill your days with effort and achievement, and still feel the quiet pull of it underneath everything: Is this actually mine? Stoicism does not promise to answer that question for you. But it offers something more useful than an answer. It offers a direction.

“If a man knows not to which port he sails, no wind is favorable.”
Seneca, Letters to Lucilius, Letter 71.3


What use is a strong wind if you have no destination? Seneca’s words cut through the noise of busyness, ambition, and distraction. They remind us that without a clear sense of direction, no progress is meaningful. You can work hard, move fast, and still drift. The Stoics were not interested in helping people achieve more. They were interested in helping people live well, which is a different project entirely.

Why Purpose Matters
Without a sense of purpose, we tend to fill the gap with substitutes. A career becomes an identity. A relationship becomes the reason to get up. Possessions, status, and wealth become measures of worth. These are all externals, things beyond our control that can be taken away. When they are, the person who built their purpose on them finds themselves without one.

This is not an abstract problem. I still struggle with it myself. The question of what I truly want, as opposed to what I have been conditioned to want, what I am chasing because it is genuinely mine, versus what I am chasing because the world expects it, does not resolve itself once and for all. It requires ongoing attention. That is precisely why the Stoics made purpose a daily practice rather than a destination to reach.

The Stoic View: Purpose Is Character, Not Destination
For the Stoics, purpose is not found. It is built through the quality of your choices, the consistency of your values, and the care with which you inhabit your roles. The Stoic word for this is telos, the end or aim of a human life. And the Stoic telos is not external success. It is living in agreement with reason and nature, which means acting according to your character as a rational and social being.

Epictetus was direct about where this has to start:

“First say to yourself, what manner of man you want to be; when you have settled this, act upon it in all you do.”
Epictetus, The Discourses, Book 3, Chapter 23.1


Not: what do you want to achieve? 
Not: what role do you want to hold? But: what kind of person do you want to be? 
That question is the anchor. Everything else follows from it. And Marcus Aurelius, who had every external success available to him as emperor of Rome, kept returning to the same ground:

“To stop talking about what the good man is like, and just be one.”
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, Book 10.16


Purpose, in this view, is not a destination to arrive at but a direction to orient toward, expressed through repeated small choices rather than single defining moments.

Know Where Your Drive Is Coming From
Some people feel a strong pull toward a particular path from an early age. That drive can feel so internal, so much their own, that they never question its source. But even a genuine-feeling drive can come from externals: the expectations of parents, the image of success a culture projects, the desire for approval dressed up as calling.

The Stoic practice here is not to suppress the drive but to interrogate it. Where is this coming from? Is it aligned with what I actually value, or with what I have been told to value? Is this purpose rooted in my faculty of choice, in what I genuinely think and decide, or is it borrowed from somewhere else?

Seneca put the distinction plainly:

“The wise person’s purpose in life is not to accomplish at all hazards what they attempt, but to do everything rightly.”
Seneca, Moral Letters to Lucilius, 85.32

The Stoic purpose is not the achievement of a specific goal. It is the quality with which you pursue whatever is in front of you. This removes the pressure to identify the one right path and replaces it with a question you can answer today: am I doing what I am doing as well and as honestly as I can?

Finding Your Direction: Three Practical Approaches
The Stoics were not interested in theory that stayed theory. Here are three ways to work with purpose as a daily practice rather than a distant destination.

Morning identity check
Each morning, before the day begins, ask: What kind of person do I want to be today? Not what do I want to achieve, but who do I want to be. Anchor yourself in that identity before the noise arrives. This is the practice Epictetus was pointing at: decide first, then act accordingly. If you cannot answer the question specifically, that itself is useful information.

Clarify your values
Write down the values you actually want to live by: honesty, courage, equanimity, care. Not the ones that sound impressive, but the ones that feel true when you are alone and honest with yourself. Use these as a filter for decisions. When something pulls at you, ask: Does this move me toward or away from the person I want to be? This is Seneca’s port. Once you know where you are sailing, every wind becomes readable.

Evening review
At the end of each day, reflect briefly: did my actions reflect who I want to be? Write down one moment where they did and one where they did not. This is not self-criticism. It is prosoche, the Stoic practice of sustained attention to yourself. Purpose is not maintained through grand gestures. It is maintained through noticing, adjusting, and returning.


What Are You Chasing?
If one day you are offered a promotion, you can use Stoic practice to project what that change would actually mean. How would it alter your life? Is it something you genuinely want, or something the world expects of you? Some people would see turning it down as a lack of ambition. A Stoic might see it as staying on course.

Stoicism helps you look rationally at the consequences of your choices before making them. Are you chasing something for yourself or something external? How will this decision affect your peace of mind? Does it align with the kind of person you said you wanted to be this morning? These are not questions that produce easy answers. But they produce honest ones.

Rethink your actions and opinions regularly. 
Are they yours, or are you pursuing someone else’s idea of a good life? 
If the question of purpose overwhelms you, break it down into the smallest possible unit: what is the right thing to do in this moment, with these circumstances, as the person I want to be? Purpose lived that way does not require a revelation. It requires attention.

Examine Who You Are
We are all on a journey, our own one. We will come across others, and some will join us for a while. But we stay on our own path until the end. To do that well, we need to know who we are. Not the version we project outward, but the one that shows up when things are difficult, when nobody is watching, when the external rewards are absent. That is where purpose actually lives.

To understand your purpose and give genuine meaning to your life, you have to know yourself. Without that foundation, the question of purpose has nowhere to land. The good news is that asking the question and doing the work of self-knowledge are the same project. You do not need to answer one before beginning the other. Start where you are.

“Examine who you are. For you are capable of understanding the divine governance of the universe, and of reasoning on what follows from that.”
Epictetus, The Discourses, Book 2, Chapter 10

Your purpose might not arrive as a revelation. It might already be present in the pattern of what you care about most, what makes you feel most alive, and what you keep returning to even when it would be easier not to. The Stoic invitation is simply to pay attention, honestly and consistently, until what was always there becomes visible.

For a deeper look at what purpose means and how the Stoics defined it philosophically, read What Is Purpose. For the Greek philosophical concept behind the Stoic view of life’s aim, explore What Is Telos.

Go Deeper
For a reflection on Epictetus’s instruction to decide who you want to be before acting, watch the Via Stoica discussion on YouTube: First say to yourself, what manner of man you want to be — Epictetus.

For a reflection on Seneca’s port metaphor and what it means to define your direction before you set sail, watch: 

If a man knows not to which port he sails, no wind is favorable
 — Seneca.




Common Questions About Finding Purpose Through Stoicism

What does Stoicism say about finding your purpose?
Stoicism teaches that purpose is not found but built through the quality of your choices and the consistency of your values. The Stoic telos, or aim of life, is living in agreement with reason and nature, which means acting according to your character rather than chasing external outcomes.

Is Stoic purpose the same as having goals?
No. Stoic purpose is grounded in character rather than achievement. Goals can be lost or blocked by circumstances outside your control. Character, which is the foundation of Stoic purpose, remains within your control regardless of what happens externally.

How do I start finding my purpose according to Stoicism?
Start with one question: what kind of person do I want to be? Not what do I want to achieve, but who do I want to be. From that answer, examine whether your daily choices reflect that identity. The gap between the two is where the work of purpose begins.

Can your Stoic purpose change over time?
Yes. The specific roles and responsibilities through which you express your purpose will change as your life changes. But the underlying orientation, toward virtue, reason, and honest engagement with what is in front of you, remains consistent.

What if I cannot identify my purpose?
The Stoics would say: begin with the role you are already in. Do it as well and as honestly as you can. Purpose is not something you discover in one moment. It reveals itself through sustained attention to your own values and responses over time.




Benny Voncken