domingo, 2 de agosto de 2026

Leisure


 Laura Martinez






WHAT is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare?—

No time to stand beneath the boughs,
And stare as long as sheep and cows:

No time to see, when woods we pass,
Where squirrels hide their nuts in grass:

No time to see, in broad daylight,
Streams full of stars, like skies at night:

No time to turn at Beauty's glance,
And watch her feet, how they can dance:

No time to wait till her mouth can
Enrich that smile her eyes began?

A poor life this if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.


W. H. Davies



The ‘Busy’ Trap

 

Freepik







If you live in America in the twenty-first century you’ve probably had to listen to a lot of people tell you how busy they are. It’s become the default response when you ask anyone how they’re doing: “Busy!” “So busy.” “Crazy busy.” It is, pretty obviously, a boast disguised as a complaint. And the stock response is a kind of congratulation: “That’s a good problem to have,” or “Better than the opposite.”

Notice it isn’t generally people pulling back-to-back shifts in the I.C.U. or commuting by bus to three minimum-wage jobs who tell you how busy they are; what those people are is not busy but tired. Exhausted. Dead on their feet. It’s almost always people whose lamented busyness is purely self-imposed: work and obligations they’ve taken on voluntarily, classes and activities they’ve “encouraged” their kids to participate in. 

They’re busy because of their own ambition or drive or anxiety, because they’re addicted to busyness and dread what they might have to face in its absence.

Almost everyone I know is busy. 
They feel anxious and guilty when they aren’t either working or doing something to promote their work. They schedule in time with friends the way students with 4.0 G.P.A.s make sure to sign up for community service because it looks good on their college applications. I recently wrote a friend to ask if he wanted to do something this week, and he answered that he didn’t have a lot of time but if something was going on to let him know and maybe he could ditch work for a few hours. I wanted to clarify that my question had not been a preliminary heads-up to some future invitation; this was the invitation. But his busyness was like some vast churning noise through which he was shouting out at me, and I gave up trying to shout back over it.

Even children are busy now, scheduled down to the half-hour with classes and extracurricular activities. They come home at the end of the day as tired as grown-ups. I was a member of the latchkey generation and had three hours of totally unstructured, largely unsupervised time every afternoon, time I used to do everything from surfing the World Book Encyclopedia to making animated films to getting together with friends in the woods to chuck dirt clods directly into one another’s eyes, all of which provided me with important skills and insights that remain valuable to this day. Those free hours became the model for how I wanted to live the rest of my life.

Not long ago I Skyped with a friend who was driven out of the city by high rent and now has an artist’s residency in a small town in the south of France. She described herself as happy and relaxed for the first time in years. She still gets her work done, but it doesn’t consume her entire day and brain. She says it feels like college—she has a big circle of friends who all go out to the café together every night. She has a boyfriend again. (She once ruefully summarized dating in New York: “Everyone’s too busy and everyone thinks they can do better.”) What she had mistakenly assumed was her personality—driven, cranky, anxious, and sad—turned out to be a deformative effect of her environment. It’s not as if any of us wants to live like this, any more than any one person wants to be part of a traffic jam or stadium trampling or the hierarchy of cruelty in high school—it’s something we collectively force one another to do.

The present hysteria is not a necessary or inevitable condition of life; it’s something we’ve chosen, if only by our acquiescence to it.

Busyness serves as a kind of existential reassurance, a hedge against emptiness; obviously your life cannot possibly be silly or trivial or meaningless if you are so busy, completely booked, in demand every hour of the day. 
I once knew a woman who interned at a magazine where she wasn’t allowed to take lunch hours out, lest she be urgently needed for some reason. This was an entertainment magazine whose raison d’être was obviated when “menu” buttons appeared on remotes, so it’s hard to see this pretense of indispensability as anything other than a form of institutional self-delusion. More and more people in this country no longer make or do anything tangible; if your job wasn’t performed by a cat or a boa constrictor in a Richard Scarry book I’m not sure I believe it’s necessary. I can’t help but wonder whether all this histrionic exhaustion isn’t a way of covering up the fact that most of what we do doesn’t matter.

I am not busy. I am the laziest ambitious person I know. 
Like most writers, I feel like a reprobate who does not deserve to live on any day that I do not write, but I also feel that four or five hours is enough to earn my stay on the planet for one more day. On the best ordinary days of my life, I write in the morning, go for a long bike ride and run errands in the afternoon, and in the evening I see friends, read or watch a movie. This, it seems to me, is a sane and pleasant pace for a day. And if you call me up and ask whether I won’t maybe blow off work and check out the new American Wing at the Met or ogle girls in Central Park or just drink chilled pink minty cocktails all day long, I will say, What time?

But just in the last few months, I’ve insidiously started, because of professional obligations, to become busy. For the first time I was able to tell people, with a straight face, that I was “too busy” to do this or that thing they wanted me to do. I could see why people enjoy this complaint; it makes you feel important, sought-after, and put-upon. Except that I hate actually being busy. Every morning my inbox was full of emails asking me to do things I did not want to do or presenting me with problems that I now had to solve. It got more and more intolerable until finally I fled town to the Undisclosed Location from which I’m writing this.

Here I am largely unmolested by obligations. There is no TV. To check email I have to drive to the library. I go a week at a time without seeing anyone I know. I’ve remembered about buttercups, stink bugs, and the stars. I read. And I’m finally getting some real writing done for the first time in months. It’s hard to find anything to say about life without immersing yourself in the world, but it’s also just about impossible to figure out what it might be, or how best to say it, without getting the hell out of it again.

An ideal human life lies somewhere between my own defiant indolence and the rest of the world’s endless frenetic hustle. My role is just to be a bad influence.

Idleness is not just a vacation, an indulgence or a vice; it is as indispensable to the brain as vitamin D is to the body, and deprived of it we suffer a mental affliction as disfiguring as rickets. The space and quiet that idleness provides is a necessary condition for standing back from life and seeing it whole, for making unexpected connections and waiting for the wild summer lightning strikes of inspiration—it is, paradoxically, necessary to getting any work done. “Idle dreaming is often of the essence of what we do,” wrote Thomas Pynchon in his essay on sloth. Archimedes’s “Eureka” in the bath, Newton’s apple, Jekyll and Hyde and the benzene ring: History is full of stories of inspirations that come in idle moments and dreams. It almost makes you wonder whether loafers, goldbricks, and no-accounts aren’t responsible for more of the world’s great ideas, inventions, and masterpieces than the hardworking.

“The goal of the future is full unemployment, so we can play. That’s why we have to destroy the present politico-economic system.” This may sound like the pronouncement of some bong-smoking anarchist, but it was actually Arthur C. Clarke, who found time between scuba diving and pinball games to write Childhood’s End and think up communications satellites. My old colleague Ted Rall recently wrote a column proposing that we divorce income from work and give each citizen a guaranteed paycheck, which sounds like the kind of lunatic notion that’ll be considered a basic human right in about a century, like abolition, universal suffrage, and eight-hour workdays. The Puritans turned work into a virtue, evidently forgetting that God invented it as a punishment.

Perhaps the world would soon slide to ruin if everyone behaved as I do. 
But I would suggest that an ideal human life lies somewhere between my own defiant indolence and the rest of the world’s endless frenetic hustle. My role is just to be a bad influence, the kid standing outside the classroom window making faces at you at your desk, urging you to just this once make some excuse and get out of there, come outside and play. 

My own resolute idleness has mostly been a luxury rather than a virtue, but I did make a conscious decision, a long time ago, to choose time over money, since I’ve always understood that the best investment of my limited time on earth was to spend it with people I love. 

I suppose it’s possible I’ll lie on my deathbed regretting that I didn’t work harder and say everything I had to say, but I think what I’ll really wish is that I could have one more beer with Chris, another long talk with Megan, one last good hard laugh with Boyd. 

Life is too short to be busy.




Tim Kreider




sábado, 1 de agosto de 2026

Go to the Limits of Your Longing



Pranab Basak






God speaks to each of us as he makes us,
then walks with us silently out of the night.

These are the words we dimly hear:

You, sent out beyond your recall,
go to the limits of your longing.
Embody me.

Flare up like flame
and make big shadows I can move in.

Let everything happen to you: beauty and terror.
Just keep going. No feeling is final.
Don’t let yourself lose me.

Nearby is the country they call life.
You will know it by its seriousness.

Give me your hand.



Rainer Maria Rilke
in, Book of Hours: Love Poems to God  




I Know What You Think of Me


Frank Sonnenberg







Recently I received an e-mail that wasn’t meant for me, but was about me. 
I’d been cc’d by accident. 

This is one of the darker hazards of electronic communication, Reason No. 697 Why the Internet Is Bad — the dreadful consequence of hitting “reply all” instead of “reply” or “forward.” 

The context is that I had rented a herd of goats for reasons that aren’t relevant here and had sent out a mass e-mail with photographs of the goats attached to illustrate that a) I had goats, and b) it was good. Most of the responses I received expressed appropriate admiration and envy of my goats, but the message in question was intended not as a response to me but as an aside to some of the recipient’s co-workers, sighing over the kinds of expenditures on which I was frittering away my uncomfortable income. The word “oof” was used.

I’ve often thought that the single most devastating cyberattack a diabolical and anarchic mind could design would not be on the military or financial sector but simply to simultaneously make every e-mail and text ever sent universally public. It would be like suddenly subtracting the strong nuclear force from the universe; the fabric of society would instantly evaporate, every marriage, friendship and business partnership dissolved. 

Civilization, which is held together by a fragile web of tactful phrasing, polite omissions and white lies, would collapse in an apocalypse of bitter recriminations and weeping, breakups and fistfights, divorces and bankruptcies, scandals and resignations, blood feuds, litigation, wholesale slaughter in the streets and lingering ill will.

This particular e-mail was, in itself, no big deal. 
Tone is notoriously easy to misinterpret over e-mail, and my friend’s message could have easily been read as affectionate head shaking rather than a contemptuous eye roll. 
It’s frankly hard to parse the word “oof” in this context. And let’s be honest — I am terrible with money, but I’ve always liked to think of this as an endearing foible. What was surprisingly wounding wasn’t that the e-mail was insulting but simply that it was unsympathetic. 

Hearing other people’s uncensored opinions of you is an unpleasant reminder that you’re just another person in the world, and everyone else does not always view you in the forgiving light that you hope they do, making all allowances, always on your side. There’s something existentially alarming about finding out how little room we occupy, and how little allegiance we command, in other people’s heads.

This experience is not a novelty of the information age; it’s always been available to us by the accident of overhearing a conversation at the wrong moment. I’ve written essays about friends that I felt were generous and empathetic, which they experienced as devastating. I’ve also been written about, in ways I could find no fault with but that were nonetheless excruciating for me to read. It is simply not pleasant to be objectively observed — it’s like seeing a candid photo of yourself online, not smiling or posing, but simply looking the way you apparently always do, oblivious and mush-faced with your mouth open. 
It’s proof that we are visible to others, that we are seen, in all our naked silliness and stupidity.

Needless to say, this makes us embarrassed and angry and damn our betrayers as vicious two-faced hypocrites. Which, in fact, we all are. We all make fun of one another behind one another’s backs, even the people we love. Of course we do — they’re ridiculous. Anyone worth knowing is inevitably also going to be exasperating: making the same obvious mistakes over and over, dating imbeciles, endlessly relapsing into their dumb addictions and self-defeating habits, blind to their own hilarious flaws and blatant contradictions and fiercely devoted to whatever keeps them miserable. (And those few people about whom there is nothing ridiculous are by far the most preposterous of all.)

Just as teasing someone to his face is a way of letting him know that you know him better than he thinks, making fun of him behind his back is a way of bonding with your mutual friends, reassuring one another that you both know and love and are driven crazy by this same person.

Although sometimes, let’s just admit, we’re simply being mean. 
A friend of mine described the time in high school when someone walked up behind her while she was saying something clever at that person’s expense as the worst feeling she had ever had — and not just because of the hurt she’d inflicted on someone else but because of what it forced her to see about herself. That she made fun of people all the time, people who didn’t deserve it, who were beneath her in the social hierarchy, just to ingratiate herself or make herself seem funny or cool.

Another friend once shared with me one of the aphorisms of 12-step recovery programs: 
“What other people think of you is none of your business.” 
Like a lot of wisdom, this sounds at first suspiciously similar to idiotic nonsense; obviously what other people think of you is your business, it’s your main job in life to try to control it, to do tireless P.R. and spin control for yourself. Every woman who ever went out with you must pine for you forever. Those who rejected you must regret it. You must be loved, respected — above all, taken seriously! They who mocked you will rue the day! The problem is that this is insane — the psychology of dictators who regard all dissent as treason, and periodically order purges to ensure unquestioning loyalty. It’s no way to run a country.

THE operative fallacy here is that we believe that unconditional love means not seeing anything negative about someone, when it really means pretty much the opposite: loving someone despite their infuriating flaws and essential absurdity. “Do I want to be loved in spite of?” Donald Barthelme writes in his story “Rebecca” about a woman with green skin. “Do you? Does anyone? But aren’t we all, to some degree?”

We don’t give other people credit for the same interior complexity we take for granted in ourselves, the same capacity for holding contradictory feelings in balance, for complexly alloyed affections, for bottomless generosity of heart and petty, capricious malice. 

We can’t believe that anyone could be unkind to us and still be genuinely fond of us, although we do it all the time.

Years ago a friend of mine had a dream about a strange invention; a staircase you could descend deep underground, in which you heard recordings of all the things anyone had ever said about you, both good and bad. The catch was, you had to pass through all the worst things people had said before you could get to the highest compliments at the very bottom. There is no way I would ever make it more than two and a half steps down such a staircase, but I understand its terrible logic: 
If we want the rewards of being loved we have to submit to the mortifying ordeal of being known.




Tim Kreider




sexta-feira, 31 de julho de 2026

A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning

 

Maria Dorota





As virtuous men pass mildly away,
   And whisper to their souls to go,
Whilst some of their sad friends do say
   The breath goes now, and some say, No:

So let us melt, and make no noise,
   No tear-floods, nor sigh-tempests move;
'Twere profanation of our joys
   To tell the laity our love.

Moving of th' earth brings harms and fears,
   Men reckon what it did, and meant;
But trepidation of the spheres,
   Though greater far, is innocent.

Dull sublunary lovers' love
   (Whose soul is sense) cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
   Those things which elemented it.

But we by a love so much refined,
   That our selves know not what it is,
Inter-assured of the mind,
   Care less, eyes, lips, and hands to miss.

Our two souls therefore, which are one,
   Though I must go, endure not yet
A breach, but an expansion,
   Like gold to airy thinness beat.

If they be two, they are two so
   As stiff twin compasses are two;
Thy soul, the fixed foot, makes no show
   To move, but doth, if the other do.

And though it in the center sit,
   Yet when the other far doth roam,
It leans and hearkens after it,
   And grows erect, as that comes home.

Such wilt thou be to me, who must,
   Like th' other foot, obliquely run;
Thy firmness makes my circle just,
   And makes me end where I begun.



 John Donne




I Stumbled Across My Boyfriend's ChatGPT and It Ended Our Relationship



Adobe Stock




It wasn't cheating or 
some dramatic betrayal. 
What I found was worse: 
his uncertainty.




I find out my now ex-boyfriend had been questioning his feelings and attraction to me in the most dystopian, laughably modern way possible: ChatGPT.

Laid on his couch, midnight on a Friday, I was working late as he snoozed blissfully on my shoulder when my phone died in the heat of a client exchange.

“Shit,” I mumbled. Pivoting, I grabbed his laptop off the floor to run my final, fatigued, glassy-eyed client response through AI.

As I powered his computer, his ChatGPT - almost poetically - was already front and center on the screen.

As I copied and pasted my email — I peered to the left side of the screen and that’s when I saw it in the sidebar: a past chat titled relationship issues and uncertainty.

I stared at the words.

Now, here is where I am certain many will piously tell me I dug my own grave. I invaded his privacy. That I never should’ve read what I read. That the man is allowed to share private thoughts with a robot he never intended for me to see.

And of course all of that is true.

But I dare you to come across your partner’s ChatGPT, read those words, and not too unravel moral senses.

And let me tell you, I wish that I had never read what I did. If only because there is something uniquely humiliating about coming across someone’s merciless, uncensored stream of consciousness about you - especially when that someone has been kissing you, sleeping beside you, introducing you to family, and making you feel chosen.

All of us who embark on the quest of love move through relationships and intimacy believing, maybe a tad foolishly but also maybe just humanly, that a person who has chosen to be with you is happily viewing you in a forgiving light. That even when you are difficult, messy, neurotic, inconvenient, they are still, fundamentally, on your side.

It’s jarring to then be faced with how provisional our place can really be in someone else’s mind.

At first, I clicked the chat assuming - with mounting annoyance - that the focus would be about my cats.

Three cats had been an issue from the start. When we met, I had one. But by the time we actually went on a first date, I had acquired two more.

(The rescues had happened in Montenegro last summer which had the roughest stray culture I’d ever seen. Two kittens looked at me with sickly eyes and suddenly I became Florence Nightingale with a litter box.)

So I was already mentally prepared to heavy sigh at his usual concerns: too many cats, too small a space, too chaotic a life, too much long-term feline commitment for a man who prizes order and peace and clean surfaces.


“Oh for the love,” I was basically muttering as I clicked. Either accept them or let’s be done with this.

But the first thing I saw was indeed not his cat complaint. It was ChatGPT’s final response.

“From what you’re sharing, you should consider ending the relationship.”

I froze.

Oh.

That’s not where I thought this was going.

I scrolled up to the beginning.

“Should I be in love after 3.5 months?” My boyfriend began the conversation to his robot Freud.

My stomach dropped: the inference of that question so clearly not in my favor that my hands grew clammy instantly.

Doing the math, we were over five months in by the time I read this conversation, so immediately I understood this chat had happened weeks ago. Beside me, a line of drool slid down his cheek as he slept peacefully against the body I would soon learn he had been privately workshopping concerns about with his robot.

I kept reading.

The conversation, I’d understand soon enough, would not go any better for me. Short sentences of nearly entirely unfavorable comments: he laid out his doubts in clipped, almost clinical fragments: my lifestyle, my sensitivity, my past, my van, my online writing, my eating disorder history, my cats. And then I saw a sentence that would lodge itself in my brain with the force of shrapnel:

“Well the cats definitely, and then there’s the whole attraction thing.”

The whole attraction thing.

My ego evaporated on the spot.

Look it’s not that I think I’m a dime - I’m a realistic lady - but this man’s entire love language was rooted in physical affection. It was quite literally the only type of love I felt certain from him. It was the category in which I had felt the safest. It was the one thing I had not questioned (because of course as a woman I had already felt some of his other uncertainty intuitively, only I just thought it was about far less crucial aspects… like cats).

I reread it over and over because I genuinely could not make my brain process.

And yet there I was, inches from him, reading that in the backdoor of his own mind, he had been questioning what I assumed was the most basic part of wanting to be with someone - their looks.

A few lines later came the body of it. I was too petite. Too frail-looking getting out of the shower he noticed once. In the beginning my hair looked damaged (This one made me extra salty. Like excuse me sir, I had been on a European beach all summer OKAY. I needed a keratin treatment CHRIST give a girl a break.) My eating disorder history made him worry what would happen if I relapsed and he lost all attraction.

I was, in short, being methodically assessed, only there was no ‘pro’ list.

That was the part that floored me.

Not that he had concerns about my body or my past or personality, though that felt awful enough. But that, in the privacy of his own thoughts, I was not being held in the warm and forgiving light I had imagined. I was not someone he adored. I was a set of liabilities. A ruminating amount of concerns. An accumulation of negative variables to be sorted and weighed and dissected through… and apparently alarmingly easy to summarize (or so it felt).

There is something existentially jarring about seeing yourself rendered that way through someone else’s eyes. You become humiliatingly aware that you are simply another person in the world: observable, discussable, reducible. Not the heroine of a RomCom, not the sum total of your intentions and tenderness, but a body and a history someone else may find embarrassing, inconvenient, or hard to love.

Then I read the line I think I will probably remember to my grave:

“I’m just not proud of her.”

He repeated it with three dots.

“… I’m just not proud of her.

“Then you should consider ending it,” Chat guided.

No. Shit.


As I finished that Chat, adrenaline running, I wondered: “how many of these conversations are there?”

To my horror, I would find handfuls.

Like those who relish in trauma porn, I could not peel myself away from the unfavorable things documented.

When I was done, I sat there, stunned into a kind of silence I didn’t know what to do with: too shocked for coherent thinking. Too confused to feel anger. Too shellshocked to evoke a reaction.

This man, I thought, looking over at him asleep beside me. This man whose country I had just visited. Whose family I had met. Whom I had left that trip feeling almost sure loved me.

This man does not love me.

It seems this man does not even really like me.

I slid out from under him carefully, gathered my shoes and charger and the little belongings I’d left around his house over the months, and packed them into my purse in silence. It was eerie how calm I was. But I think there is a kind of calm the body enters when it has passed the point of immediate feeling and gone straight into evacuation mode.

I left without a word.

I drove home at 1 a.m. in total silence, and by the time I got through my front door the calls had already started.

Where are you?
What is going on?
Are you okay?

I couldn’t answer. Every inch of me lit with humiliation. Every prideful cell in my body writhed in anger and shame. I would not show how hurt I was to this man. I did not want to offer him the intimacy of watching me react to what he had written.

I turned off my phone.

Half an hour later, his headlights lit up my bedroom window.

By then, the rage I’d initially stifled was now beginning to coarse through my body.

The fact this was on ChatGPT, in its own way, made the whole thing feel even more grotesque and surreal. It was like accidentally reading someone’s diary, except the diary was a fucking robot - predisposed to agree with him, ready to take his cruel thoughts and shape them into something that sounded reasonable.

I flinched, wondering how often (and intensely) he must’ve been mentally suffering with his concerns about me that he felt he needed to use AI to decipher them.

I was all around horrified. And when he rang the doorbell incessantly, I opened the front door and hissed in a Gollum-esque voice: “Get the fuck out of here.”

He looked terrified. Truly bewildered.

“What is going on,” he pleaded in my doorway. His voice shaky. He paced back and forth. “What did I do?” He asked over and over.

And when I said nothing, but instead turned my head as tears began to burn, he ran his hands through his hair and fell to his knees. Grasping onto mine tightly.

In that moment I had the strangest flashback. A déjà vu.

Years earlier, a different boyfriend had left me in our Boulder house — full of our cat and four dogs we were watching — while our neighborhood was under a fire evacuation warning, because he still wanted to go to some forest rave with friends. Emergency sirens down the street, smoke on the hill, and this absolute buffoon gives me a hug goodbye and as my jaw hung open - he peels out of the driveway to go do party drugs in the woods with no WiFi.

I had left that boyfriend in a similar manner as this present situation. Eerily calm and resigned. Once the fire warning ended, I waited til morning when I knew our friends would soon be back to pick up their dogs, and I grabbed our cat, packed everything I owned into my Honda Accord, left a note that I was done, and I walked out. I disappeared for days to a hotel nearby, responding only to a roommate to let her know I was fine but did not want to speak to him.

When I finally chose to text back, some thousands of pleading texts later, he arrived to the hotel unshowered, unkempt, a sobbing mess, and he too crumpled to the floor, clutching at my knees and begging for forgiveness through muffled pleas for our cat, who remained judgmentally staring from the hotel window.

So standing there on my porch now, watching yet another man unravel in the wreckage of his own emotional blockage, I felt not just hurt but haunted by recognition.

I had seen this movie before. I have already lived this plot.

How many times, I wondered, does a woman have to stand in the aftermath of a man’s lack of emotional wherewithal and then be asked to comfort him because the consequences become real?

I peered down at him.

This man.

A strong man, a brilliant one too. Respected by the community, admired by many.

How scared and childlike he appeared in this situation. How unsettling it was to see him disoriented.

A part of me wanted to hug him, crouched pitifully, looking so unsure and shaken.

The maternal instinct in me activated: torn between hurt but also a protective nature to help those close to me when they suffer.

But the words I’d read repeated themselves like banner ads.

I’m just not proud of her.

Finally I said it.

“I read everything,” I hissed. “I read your whole fucking ChatGPT.”

His face changed instantly. He looked stricken. Horrified. Instantly ashamed.

His shoulders slumped. “Oh God, he muttered “No. No. Oh no.”

And what followed was what you’d assume follows these types of chaotic situations: tears, apologies, explanations, clarifications, hours and hours of talk. He reiterated he did care about me. That it was more nuanced than it looked, which I’m sure is all true. That he had been confused, scared, and trying to sort it out. That he was attracted to me. That he did not want to lose me. That he was sorry.

And, against my feminine intuition, we tried to continue dating.

This is the part I probably judge myself over as much as the reading.

Because in my heart I knew that night that between me violating his privacy coupled with the depth of the criticisms he wrote, the relationship was likely unsalvageable.

But there is something quite disorienting about being wounded by someone and then immediately witnessing their anguish over hurting you. It blurred the edges of my reality. It turned pain into a shared emotional event, laying in my bed the entire weekend dissecting what had happened. It tempted me into mercy before I’d had the chance to fully recognize my own feelings and the aftermath of what this would mean.

To be fair to him, he really did try after that. For the next few months he was nothing but an attentive boyfriend. More expressive. More deliberate. Kinder. More reassuring.

But the problem was no longer what he wrote.

The problem was that I knew what he once thought - unfiltered.

I knew that beneath the affection and the tenderness and the effort, there had recently been a private record in which I had been repeatedly tallied and found uncertain. I knew that somewhere inside his care for me there had been deliberation. Qualification. Massive hesitation.

And once I knew that, I could not not-know it.

After that, every reassurance had an echo under it. Every compliment felt slightly unstable. Every act of love arrived with a shadow question attached: do you mean this, or are you still trying to convince yourself?

I could stomach his doubts.

What I could not do was build a foundation with someone on top of them.

That was I suppose the biggest revelation of the whole ordeal: not that he privately had unflattering thoughts about me — I’m sure other exes have said worse, and I’m fully aware I, too, have had unkind thoughts about people I cared for and ‘icks’ unjustified. Intimacy does not erase judgment. Loving someone does not mean being blinded by their flaws.

But I do think there is a difference between loving someone despite their absurdities and trying to decide whether they are, on balance, tolerable enough to actually choose.

It is one thing to suspect that the people who love you also find you difficult, absurd, exasperating, even disappointing at times. It is another thing entirely to read the actual transcript. Some knowledge alters the chemistry of a relationship beyond repair. It removes the protective blur that makes intimacy obtainable.

And I ultimately could not bear the possibility that he might have stayed with me, anyway. That he might have kept trying, kept sliding further into a shared life, kept reasoning his way through it, maybe even married me and had a whole few decades together — all the while some part of him remained fundamentally unsure and he just never quite chose otherwise.

That, to me, felt intolerably lonelier than being alone again in my 30s.

So a few months later, in my car after I had arrived 20 minutes late to our date (I had admittedly inadvertently started ‘punishing’ him with behavior like this like a petulant child, yes I’m now in therapy), I said what I knew would be true from the moment I saw that ChatGPT glowing at me from his laptop screen: I would never be able to stop doubting his love.

Through tears and long sighs, I think we both understood.

Ultimately, I want to share that I forgive him. As I hope he does me for violating his inner world. This is certainly not intended to be a hit piece on an ex as I know by even sharing this story I too will (and perhaps should) receive flack for betraying someone’s private thoughts, robot or not.

I don’t come away from this believing he was a villain, or even that he wronged me in some exceptional way. If anything, what made it so painful was how ordinary it probably was. We all have private thoughts we would never want subpoenaed. We all contain some humiliating mixture of tenderness, impatience, loyalty, vanity, fear, and occasional cruelty. The problem was not that he had doubts, or which I suspect most relationships do. 
The problem was that unfortunately I saw them in their raw form, stripped of tact and timing and love’s softening language.

I was never meant to read what I read. And he was allowed to be human and conflicted and imperfectly loyal in private.

I am not an easy person to be with. I suppose no one is but I am not blind to my defects.

The logical side of me - devoid of ego - understood some of why he felt the way he did.

I do battle with an eating disorder that at times has made me look unhealthy (naturally, I don’t see that but alas). And at times has made me unreliable and flaky.

I do have a big, full, nomadic, van-living past with a lot of uprooted stories.

I get why a friend once called me “high risk high reward.”

So maybe this event is simply, as Tim Kreider wrote, “the price of being known”
that if you want the rewards of intimacy, sooner or later, you risk colliding with the version of yourself that exists outside your own narration and in somebody else’s unvarnished language … and finding the result less poetic than you hoped.


Truthfully, we were probably just not right for each other and it simply bled out into this situation. His ordered life was never going to be a natural home for my hurricane tendencies, my stray cats, my intensity, my desire for novelty. And I was never going to thrive inside the cool logic of a man who prefers to checklist his way into certainty.

At this point in my life, I am not asking for a fantasy romance. I am not asking for some teenage version of love untouched by disappointment. I have had way too much heartbreak for that innocence.

But I do know I do not want to be chosen by a man who has to continuously talk himself into me.

I do not want to spend my life beside someone who may stay, may commit, may even be loyal … and yet remain, in some private chamber of himself, unconvinced.

In the end, I had wandered by accident into the back office of his love for me and found the paperwork. The doubts, the calculations, the small private notations beside my name. Maybe this is ordinary. Maybe all love looks less romantic under fluorescent light.

But after that, I could not return to the front of the house and pretend I had not seen the ledger.



Lindsey Hall




“If we want the rewards of being loved we have to submit to the mortifying ordeal of being known,” 
Tim Kreider





quinta-feira, 30 de julho de 2026

Sonnet 29


Magnific





When, in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes,
I all alone beweep my outcast state,
And trouble deaf heaven with my bootless cries,
And look upon myself and curse my fate,
Wishing me like to one more rich in hope,
Featured like him, like him with friends possessed,
Desiring this man’s art and that man’s scope,
With what I most enjoy contented least;
Yet in these thoughts myself almost despising,
Haply I think on thee, and then my state,
(Like to the lark at break of day arising
From sullen earth) sings hymns at heaven’s gate;
       For thy sweet love remembered such wealth brings
       That then I scorn to change my state with kings.



Shakespeare




Destiny


Fateetech/Magnific





 A word that invites 
belief or disbelief




Destiny
always has a possessor, as in my destiny or your destiny or her destiny; it gives a sense of something we cannot avoid or something waiting for us; it is a word of storybook or mythic dimension. Destiny is hardly used in everyday conversation; it is a word that invites belief or disbelief: we reject the ordering of events by some fated, unseen force or we agree that there seems to be a greater hand than our own, working at the edges of even the most average life. But speaking of destiny not only grants us a sense of our own possibilities but gives us an intimation of our flaws: 
we sense, along with Shakespeare, that what is unresolved or unspoken in human character might overwhelm the better part of ourselves.
When we choose between these two poles, of mythic triumph or fated failure, we may miss the everyday conversational essence of destiny: our future influenced by the very way we hold the conversation of life itself, never mind any actions we might take or neglect to take. Two people, simply by looking at the future in radically different ways, have completely different futures awaiting them, no matter their immediate course of action. Even the same course of action, coming from a different way of shaping the conversation, will result in a different outcome. We are shaped by our shaping of the world and are shaped again in turn. The way we face the world alters the face we see in the world.

Strangely, every person always lives out their destiny, no matter what they do, according to the way they shape the conversation, but that destiny may be lived out on the level of consummation or complete frustration, through experiencing a homecoming or a distant sense of exile, or more likely some gradation along the spectrum that lies between. It is still our destiny, our life, but the sense of satisfaction involved and the possibility of fulfilling its promise may depend upon a brave participation, a willingness to hazard ourselves in a difficult world, a certain form of wild generosity with our gifts; a familiarity with our own depth, our own discovered, surprising breadth; and always, a long practised and robust vulnerability equal to what any future may offer. 
Our destiny is fated not only by great powers beyond our beckoning horizon but by the very way we shape and hold the everyday conversations of a familiar life.



David Whyte
in, Consolations: The Solace, Nourishment and Underlying Meaning in Everyday Words





terça-feira, 28 de julho de 2026

Let This Darkness Be a Bell Tower


Pranab Basak






Quiet friend who has come so far,

feel how your breathing makes more space around you.
Let this darkness be a bell tower
and you the bell. As you ring,

what batters you becomes your strength.
Move back and forth into the change.
What is it like, such intensity of pain?
If the drink is bitter, turn yourself to wine.

In this uncontainable night,
be the mystery at the crossroads of your senses,
the meaning discovered there.

And if the world has ceased to hear you,
say to the silent earth: I flow.
To the rushing water, speak: I am.

 

Rainer Maria Rilke




Thich Nhat Hanh: The Monk Who Found Peace in the Middle of War

 



A Zen master’s profound insight 
into anxiety, distraction, 
emotional overload, and 
the lost art of inner peace



Most people think peace comes after life becomes easier.

After the anxiety ends.
After the conflict disappears.
After everything is finally under control.

Thich Nhat Hanh spent his entire life proving the opposite.

He taught:

Peace does not begin when suffering disappears.
Peace begins when you stop running from the present moment.

And he did not learn this in a quiet monastery.
He learned it in the middle of war.


Who Was Thich Nhat Hanh?
Thich Nhat Hanh (1926–2022) was a Vietnamese Zen master, poet, peace activist, and one of the most influential mindfulness teachers in modern history.

But unlike many spiritual teachers, his wisdom was not separated from real life.
He lived through:
war, violence, exile, political persecution, human suffering on a massive scale

And yet, he became known for teaching one thing above all: gentle awareness.


A Monk in the Middle of War
During the Vietnam War, many believed spirituality should remain separate from society.

Meditate quietly.
Stay detached.
Avoid politics and suffering.

Thich Nhat Hanh rejected this completely.
He believed: If meditation cannot help human suffering, it is incomplete.
So he created what later became known as: “Engaged Buddhism”
A path where mindfulness is not escape from life— but direct participation in life with awareness and compassion.

He and his students:
rebuilt bombed villages
cared for wounded civilians
helped refugees
organized peace efforts amid violence

Meditation was not separate from action.
It became action.


Exile and Loss
Because of his peace activism, both sides of the war distrusted him.
Eventually, he was exiled from Vietnam for nearly 40 years.

Imagine this:
unable to return home,
watching your country suffer from afar,
losing your homeland while teaching peace.

Many people would become bitter.
But Thich Nhat Hanh became softer.
This is why his teaching carried unusual depth:
it was not built on comfort.
it was built on direct contact with suffering.

His Core Insight: Suffering Needs Awareness, Not Resistance
One of his most important teachings was surprisingly simple: “The way out is in.”


Modern people usually react to pain in two ways:
suppression
distraction

But Thich Nhat Hanh taught a third way:
mindful presence.

Not escaping suffering.
Not drowning in suffering.
But holding suffering gently in awareness.



The Art of Mindful Living
Unlike complex spiritual systems, his practice was radically ordinary.

He taught people to:
  • breathe consciously
  • walk slowly
  • wash dishes mindfully
  • drink tea with awareness
  • listen deeply
  • speak compassionately

Why?
Because he believed: enlightenment is not separate from ordinary life.
The present moment itself is the practice.


Why His Teaching Matters Today
Modern people live in constant psychological fragmentation:
  • endless scrolling
  • multitasking
  • emotional overstimulation
  • anxiety about the future
  • inability to rest mentally

Most people are physically present— but psychologically elsewhere.

Thich Nhat Hanh saw this long before smartphones existed.
He warned: A distracted mind cannot experience life deeply.


His Most Powerful Teaching: 
Returning to the Present
According to Thich Nhat Hanh:
Most suffering comes from leaving the present moment.

The mind constantly moves toward:
  • regret
  • fear
  • anticipation
  • replaying conversations
  • imagined futures
But peace only exists in one place: here.



Practical Wisdom for Modern Life

1. Breathe before reacting
Before responding emotionally:
pause
inhale
exhale

This interrupts unconscious reaction.

2. Treat emotions gently
Do not fight anger immediately.
Do not suppress sadness.

He often said: 
“Hold your suffering like a mother holds a crying baby.”

This changes the relationship with pain.


3. Stop consuming constantly
Modern people consume nonstop:
  1. information
  2. stimulation
  3. entertainment
  4. emotional drama
But constant consumption weakens awareness.
Sometimes silence heals more than stimulation.


4. Practice mindfulness in ordinary activities
You do not need a mountain retreat.

Mindfulness can happen while:
  1. drinking tea
  2. washing dishes
  3. walking
  4. listening
  5. breathing
This is what made his teaching globally accessible.


5. Understand interbeing
One of his most famous teachings was:
“Interbeing”

Meaning:
nothing exists independently.
Your suffering affects others.
Your peace affects others.

We are deeply interconnected.



Why Millions Resonated With Him
Because his teaching felt human.
Not cold philosophy.
Not rigid religion.
But compassionate clarity.

He showed people: 
mindfulness is not about becoming perfect.
It is about becoming present enough to stop abandoning your own life.


Final Reflection
Thich Nhat Hanh did not teach people to escape the world.
He taught them how to remain awake inside it.

Not through force.
Not through ideology.
But through gentle awareness of each moment.

And perhaps his deepest teaching was this:

Peace is not something waiting for you in the future.
It is the way you breathe, walk, and meet this moment right now.




in, Zen & Mind: Reflections on Zen Wisdom and Inner Awareness




segunda-feira, 27 de julho de 2026

Ahead of all parting


Victor Hugo Casillas Romo





Be ahead of all parting, as if it had already happened.
like winter, which even now is passing.
For beneath the winter is a winter so endless
that to survive it at all is a triumph of the heart.

Be forever dead in Eurydice, and climb back singing.
Climb praying as you return to connection.
Here among the disappearing, in the realm of the transient,
be a ringing glass that shatters as it rings.

Be. And, at the same time, know what it is not to be.
The non-being inside you allows you to vibrate
in full resonance with your world. Use it for once.

To all that has run its course, and to the vast unsayable
numbers of beings abounding in Nature,
add yourself gladly, and cancel the cost.



Rainer Maria Rilke 
In, Praise of Mortality: Rilke's Duino Elegies & Sonnets to Orpheus




Letting Go


Rob Christiaans






Finding the Secret, 
Hidden but Difficult Beauty 
in Every Ending



The ending of relationships, the ending of friendships, the ending of a work, a conversation that is making us smaller, a book we are trying to write, or even a single line of a poem: all of them difficult, all of them, in their particular form of ending, necessary. 

We find most endings difficult and nearly all of them hurtful and traumatic and yet almost always afterwards, after each ending, we find we would never voluntarily reverse things and go back to our old life.

The poet Rilke said 
‘Be ahead of all parting’ 
as an invitation to a radically anticipatory way of living that is just as committed to letting go as it is to taking on.

The stakes are always high in every letting go and every ending. 
The way we leave can shape our new life to the good or to the bad. 
In the very seed of the ending and the integrity with which we make the passage from old to new, grows the fresh and vibrant life that emerges so surprisingly from our difficult moving on.

The ability to anticipate these new arrivals and hold to what is firm and true through all our successive experiences of falling apart is exactly what makes a foundation for a new life, a new home, a new love or a new work. 

The hidden beauty of endings almost always lives in the letting go. 
What is marvelous and truly beautiful in a new life always arises from what is initially invisible, from what seems like a secret; from what is hidden, both inside us and in the very physical world into which we are stepping.




 David Whyte




domingo, 26 de julho de 2026

On Quitting


glam





How much grit do you think you’ve got?
Can you quit a thing that you like a lot?
You may talk of pluck; it’s an easy word,
And where’er you go it is often heard;
But can you tell to a jot or guess
Just how much courage you now possess?

You may stand to trouble and keep your grin,
But have you tackled self-discipline?
Have you ever issued commands to you
To quit the things that you like to do,
And then, when tempted and sorely swayed,
Those rigid orders have you obeyed?

Don’t boast of your grit till you’ve tried it out,
Nor prate to men of your courage stout,
For it’s easy enough to retain a grin
In the face of a fight there’s a chance to win,
But the sort of grit that is good to own
Is the stuff you need when you’re all alone.

How much grit do you think you’ve got?
Can you turn from joys that you like a lot?
Have you ever tested yourself to know
How far with yourself your will can go?
If you want to know if you have grit,
Just pick out a joy that you like, and quit.

It’s bully sport and it’s open fight;
It will keep you busy both day and night;
For the toughest kind of a game you’ll find
Is to make your body obey your mind.
And you never will know what is meant by grit
Unless there’s something you’ve tried to quit.




 Edgar Albert Guest



 

Leave Before You Are Forced

Kathreen / iStock



 On the quiet grace of 
releasing at the right time



There is a moment, felt in the quiet of the evening, when the room has grown too warm for the coat you are still wearing. Your body knows it. Yet you keep the coat on, because to remove it would mean admitting the season has changed. 

Most of us do not leave rooms, jobs, roles, or old versions of ourselves. 
We wait. We linger. 
We are, in the end, asked to go.


The Daily Meditation 
 
Fill your bowl to the brim and it will spill. Keep sharpening your knife and it will blunt. Do your work, then step back. This is the only path to serenity.
Lao Tzu



The Diagnosis

Before the mind can grasp the lesson, the body must confess the ache. 
There is a particular exhaustion that comes not from doing too much, but from holding on too long. It is a heaviness in a place that should feel light. 

Perhaps you recognize it in these forms:

  • A tightness in the shoulders on Sunday evening, though you cannot yet say why the coming week feels heavier than the last one you survived.
  • The compulsive rehearsal of your credentials — the title, the tenure, the numbers — as though the mind must keep proving to itself that your place is still yours.
  • A quiet resentment that visits at odd hours: the friendship you outgrew, the role that no longer fits, the version of yourself you keep dressing up for the world every morning.

These are not signs that you are weak. They are the soul's early warnings. 
They are the smoke before the fire the neighbors will one day see. 
Most of what we call burnout, quiet desperation, or midlife unrest is simply this: 
we did not leave when it was time to leave. Now the leaving must be done for us, and it will be done less kindly.


The Unpacking

The Shadow is the belief that to release something is to lose it. That to step back from a role is to disappear. That if you stop pouring yourself into the bowl, the bowl will forget you existed. 
The Shadow whispers a single sentence, in a voice that sounds like your own: 
what will you be without this?

The Light is the recognition that timing is a form of mastery greater than effort. To leave at the peak, before the applause fades, before the body breaks, before the ivy overtakes the stone — this is not surrender. It is the highest expression of self-knowledge. 
You are not what you do. You are the one who chooses when the doing stops.

Consider how nature performs this. 
The ripe fruit does not cling to the branch. When it is ready, it falls. It does not consult the tree for permission. It does not fear the ground. It obeys a deeper rhythm — one that trusts what comes next. The tree, in turn, does not mourn. It prepares for winter. It sheds. It rests. It becomes ready to bear again.

We have been taught the opposite. 
We have been taught to grip. To endure. To outlast. To be the last one at the party, the last one at the desk, the last one holding the title. 
But every grip has a cost. 
What you refuse to release begins, silently, to release you. Slowly. Then all at once.
Serenity is not found in accumulation. 
It is found in the willingness to step back when the work is done — and to know, in the marrow, when it is done. This knowing is not thought. It is felt. And most of us have been trained to override the feeling until the world overrides us.


The Parable

In the year 305, something happened in Rome that had almost never happened before. An emperor stepped down from power while still alive, and unforced.

His name was Diocletian. He had ruled for twenty years. He had reorganized the empire, stabilized the currency, redrawn the map of Roman power. He was not overthrown. He was not dying. He simply looked at the throne one morning and knew: the work was done.

He retired to a palace by the sea, on the coast of what is now Croatia, and he grew cabbages in a walled garden.

Years later, when civil war broke out and old allies rode to him, begging him to don the purple once more, to save the empire he had built, he sent back one of the most striking replies in the historical record. He told them, in essence: if you could see the cabbages I have grown with my own hands, you would not ask me this.

He had understood something the emperors before him — nearly all murdered, poisoned, or dragged from their beds in the night — had never grasped. 
Power that clings past its season becomes a coffin dressed as a throne. 
He left while he could still walk out on his own feet. 
He chose the cabbage over the crown, and lived out his years in a peace no reigning Caesar of that age ever tasted.

Most men are removed from what they love. He removed himself. 
That is the difference between being ended and ending well.


The Modern Mirror

You are not a Roman emperor. But there is a throne in your life. It simply has a different name.

It may be the job that once thrilled you and now hollows you — the one you cannot leave because your identity has grown around the title like ivy around a statue. Pull the ivy away, and you fear there will be no statue underneath. So you stay. You optimize. You attend the meetings that mean nothing. You laugh at the jokes that no longer land. Each morning you rehearse, in the bathroom mirror, the person you used to be here.

It may be a project, a business, a friendship, a version of yourself that served you at twenty-five and imprisons you at forty. It may be a role in your family — the fixer, the provider, the strong one — that everyone has come to expect, including you.

The modern sickness is not that we work too hard. It is that we have forgotten how to leave. 
We wait for the layoff, the diagnosis, the betrayal, the collapse. 
We outsource the decision to circumstance, because circumstance feels less like failure than choice.

But circumstance is not merciful. It does not care about your dignity. 
It will strip you of the role in front of everyone who has ever known you, and you will call it tragedy — when in truth, you had years of quiet warning.

Leave the room before the room asks you to leave. 
That is the whole of the art.




in, Stoic Wisdom