Mend your garden...

If you understand and can assimilate both the structure and dynamics of the universe, you can then align your thoughts and your actions to be in resonance with the fundamental processes of the universe, leading to experiencing more flow and less resistance in your daily life...  

in, Resonance Science

"It's all an illusion" DAVID ICKE

Elements

"There are 5 gross elements, namely earth, water, fire, air and ether. There are also five subtle elements: smell, taste, color, touch and sound. The senses for acquiring knowledge and the organs for action number 10, namely the auditory sense, the sense of taste, the tactile sense, the sense of sight, the sense of smell, the active organ for speaking, the active organs for working, and those for traveling, generating and evacuating. The internal, subtle senses are experienced as having 4 aspects, in the shape of mind, intelligence, ego and contaminated consciousness. Distinctions between them can be made only by different functions, since they represent different characteristics. All these are considered the qualified Brahman. The mixing element, which is known as time, is counted as the twenty-fifth element."

Since time is distance in space, time is memory on the structure of space. Without memory, there is no time. Without time, there is no memory. It then follows that the energy that we perceive as the material world must be information, or energy on the structure of space. 
– Nassim Haramein

......................................... subtle energy

What we commonly call "space" is actually the one thing that exists in the universe... something we also call space-time, the unified field, the vacuum, Planck field, quantum foam, ether, plenum, source field... many cultures have a name for this "subtle energy".

The Andromeda Galaxy viewed via various frequencies...

There is a fundamental field of information that is the source of our consciousness. Consciousness is not an epiphenomenon of your brain, it's actually something that your brain is tuned into like a radio is tuned to a set of information.
– Nassim Haramein

Visualizing your antenna & field interactions

The vector equilibrium

The vector equilibrium is the true zero reference of the energetic mathematics… the zerophase of conceptual integrity inherent in the positive and negative asymmetries that propagate the differentials of consciousness. 

          Buckminster Fuller

We are the Universe, in human form

There are about 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (7 octillion) atoms in your body...

The heaviest element within us is oxygen, which accounts for about 65% of our body mass. Oxygen atoms exist mostly as water molecules, in combination with the lighter (and more ancient) element hydrogen, whose origins stretch back to the Big Bang.

About 50-70% of our biology is made up of water. Every time you eat, drink or breathe in air you are absorbing atoms that will become "you."

We also release atoms daily, in fact about 98% of the atoms in our body are replaced each year. That means that "you" are quite literally a completely different person every New Year.

We exchange our atoms with the air, with the clouds, rivers, trees, flowers, insects and animals. We also take in energy every day, photons captured by plant leaves (through photosynthesis) as they stream to the Earth from the sun. We are 100% solar powered.

What Van Gogh expressed in his paintings was profoundly close to the vision of our bodies and Universe as discovered by modern science. Nature is an interconnected evolving mosaic, an ever-changing work of cosmic living art where atoms and energy circulate in new patterns endlessly.

Paradoxically, while our bodies renew themselves constantly, at the deepest level we are ancient cosmic beings. Every atom of "you" is billions of years old, formed either in the Big Bang (over 13 billion years ago) or in stars that burst as supernovas approximately 5 to 12 billion years back, before our planet and solar system formed.

While oxygen (created in super nova explosions billions of years ago) accounts for most of our body mass it is actually hydrogen atoms (from the Big Bang) that are most plentiful, accounting for over half of the number of atoms in your body.

In a very deep sense we are the Universe, in human form. 
Something worth contemplating and celebrating?


Christopher
in, Creative Systems Thinking

"You are not IN the universe, you ARE the universe, an intrinsic part of it. Ultimately you are not a person, but a focal point where the universe is becoming conscious of itself. What an amazing miracle.” 
~Eckhart Tolle 

"We do not "come into" this world; we come out of it, as leaves from a tree... Every individual is an expression of the whole realm of Nature, a unique action of the total Universe." 
~Alan Watts

The Real Da Vinci Code

The Big-Gate Key

Richard Cassaro

"When one holds the key it is not difficult to open the different doors and discover what lies behind, but if one has no key, or if one does not understand how it should be used, the doors remain securely sealed, and the curious are obliged to guess what they possibly screen from sight." 
 – Tons Brunés

"The generally accepted history of humanity is based upon a progression that begins with early hominids developing “stone age” tools, then advancing on with an increasing capacity to hunt animals and establish agricultural practices and other technologies that established civilization in our early history. What if this story is incomplete? What if there is evidence of a more ancient and far more advanced civilization that perhaps had access to technologies that could accomplish feats that even today we can only dream of?” 
- The Resonance Academy

                           

The energy of a place

It’s said that after arriving in a new place, we will have replaced the entirety of the water in our bodies with that of the local watershed in just a few days. Though these adaptations happen at a biological level, we are vastly unconscious of the implications a place has on our psyche. Just as humans carry an energetic signature, so too do geographies. However, like fish swimming in water, we are rarely aware of what energy a place holds until we leave it, or return to it after time away.
Toko-pa Turner

Geometry is a visual form of harmony

Geometry is a visual form of harmony:
the harmony of parts with each other and with the whole.
The world is composed of diverse and contrasting elements.
It is harmony that restores unity to the contrasting parts and weaves them into a cosmos...
– Jonathan Quintin

We are an extension of the Universe

You are the Universe in human form

The matrix of all matter

“As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.” 

Max Planck, Florence, Italy, 1944

Universe at the end of 2018

How particles may be micro black holes

The idea of particles being tiny black holes may at first pass seem strange, yet even within the canonical model of particle physics elementary particles like electrons and quarks are taken to have mass yet occupy zero-dimension. In fact, because of the self-energy of a point-particle leptons have infinite bare mass and infinite bare charge — vacuum fluctuations are needed to shield these infinite values. Such a point-particle is a singularity, or in more common parlance a black hole.  

 William Brown

So why then are elementary particles not commonly viewed as micro black holes? One reason is that quantum field theory treats particles as extended probabilistic objects, which do not exist except as a superposition of states -- so they are not truly point-particles since they don't actually occupy any specific point in space. Yet, the same theory stipulates that upon collapse of the wavefunction a particle will return to a point-like position, and we are back at a singularity. Even within string theory, there are close parallels between strings, their behavior as branes, and singularities or black holes.

Another argument is that micro black holes could not possibly exhibit any of the characteristics observed of elementary particles -- and while this is taken as a basic assumption, actual investigations into the matter have shown that micro black holes can in fact exhibit many of the characteristics observed in elementary particles.

For example, in the study Hadrons as Kerr-Newman Black Holes, by Robert Oldershaw of Amherst College, the logical argument and empirical self-consistency of a 'particles-as-black holes' model is evaluated (note, a hadron is a "composite" subatomic particle, such as a proton, neutron, or meson):

The scale invariance of the source-free Einstein field equations suggests that one might be able to model hadrons as “strong gravity” black holes, if one uses an appropriate rescaling of units or a revised gravitational coupling factor.

For the case of hadrons, it is at least logically possible that the gravitational coupling between matter and the geometry of space-time is much stronger than for macroscopic systems. The value of the gravitational coupling factor has never been measured within an atom or a subatomic particle. The standard use of the Newtonian value in this domain is based purely on an untested assumption.

One might well ask whether there are observational data or theoretical results that support the “strong gravity” hypothesis. In fact there is some interesting evidence that is consistent with this unorthodox idea. As discussed in detail by Sivaram and Sinha (1977), hadrons and Kerr-Newman black holes share an intriguing set of similarities.

Both hadrons and Kerr-Newman black holes are almost entirely characterized by just three parameters: mass, charge and angular momentum.
Both hadrons and Kerr-Newman black holes have magnetic dipole moments, but do not have electric dipole moments.
Typical hadrons and Kerr-Newman black holes have gyromagnetic ratios of 2.
Hadrons and Kerr-Newman black holes have similar linear relationships between angular momentum and mass squared.
When Kerr-Newman black holes interact, their surface areas may increase but can never decrease, which is potentially analogous to the increase of cross-sections found in hadron collisions.
Given these curious similarities between the fundamental characteristics of hadrons and Kerr-Newman black holes, there appears to be sufficient motivation for considering the “strong gravity” approach to hadrons.

Einstein's Singularity and Wheeler's Quantum Geometrodynamics

In 1935, Albert Einstein and Nathaniel Rosen addressed the issue of the "particle as singularity" in the renowned paper "the particle problem in the general theory of relativity". Einstein and Rosen wanted a theory that got rid of the point-particle singularity and described material particles purely from the gravitational solution of general relativity and Maxwell's solutions of electromagnetism -- a unified theory.

To this end, they imagined a path tracing radially inward to the singularity. Instead of trying to cross the event horizon and proceed down to the center, Einstein and Rosen showed how to match the path onto another track that emerges outward again–but into a separate section of spacetime. Imagine funnel shapes pulled out of two adjacent rubber sheets and connected at their necks, providing a continuous, tube-shaped path from one surface to the other. This construction makes a smooth connection or bridge between two distinct pieces of spacetime. The Einstein-Rosen bridge was formed.

Nearly 20 years later the preeminent physicist John Archibald Wheeler revisited Einstein and Rosen's unification scheme, and formed the field of quantum geometrodynamics. Wheeler described how an extremely stong electromagnetic field would curve spacetime to such a strong degree it would curve back on itself, forming a torus (like a photon ring), and at the dimensions of the quantum scale would form a micro black hole.

Such an object would be indistinguishable from a particle: what Wheeler termed a gravitational electromagnetic entity, or Geon. It would have mass and charge even though these were not intrinsic characteristics of the field before forming the micro black hole, they would become an effective consequence of the spacetime geometry.

Similar to the Einstein-Rosen bridge, Wheeler described these geons as particle pairs connected by a spacetime bridge, or wormhole: the Wheeler wormhole was formed. Recently, in a study investigating the geometry of entanglement (ERb = EPR) calculations have predicted the formation of a Wheeler wormhole particle pair via the holographic Schwinger effect.

While the majority of physicists in the unification regimes veered away from quantum geometrodynamics in favor of string theories, work continued on the idea. In 1968 Brandon Carter showed that a black hole with the same mass, charge, and angular momentum as an electron would match the observed magnetic moment of the electron. This is an important finding because calculations that do not include general relativity and treat the electron as a small rotating sphere of charge give a magnetic moment that is off by roughly a factor of 2.

In 2008 a study investigating "a scenario for strong gravity in particle physics" found that Unruh-Hawking evaporating black holes will undergo a type of phase transition resulting in variously long-lived quantized objects of reasonable sizes, including those of particles within the quantum domain. Again, this led to speculation that perhaps everything is made of micro black holes.

In 2012, Nassim Haramein discovered (continuing from earlier work) that the confinement force of a hadron and nucleus can be exactly described from the gravitational force of a Schwarzschild proton (a black hole with the same diameter of a proton), with no need for the post hoc addition of a contrived strong force.

Even though such calculations demonstrate that micro black holes recapitulate the characteristics observed of elementary particles, and can actually described the generation of intrinsic characteristics like mass, charge, and spin from first principles -- the idea of micro black holes receives strong criticism.

In a 1992 paper, Christoph Holzhey and Frank Wilczek investigated how certain black holes can reasonably be interpreted as behaving like normal elementary particles:

"Is there a fundamental distinction between black holes and elementary particles? The use of concepts like entropy, temperature, and dissipative response in the description of black hole interactions makes these objects seem very different from elementary particles. This has helped inspire some suspicion that the description of the holes may require a departure from the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. However a more conservative attitude is certainly not precluded. In the bulk of this paper, we shall analyze a particular class of black hole solutions (extremal dilaton black holes) in some detail, and argue that some of these do in fact appear to behave very much as elementary particles." 
- Black Holes as Elementary Particles

While our discussion here does not by any means exhaust the entirety of the sources and information that can be presented on this topic, it should give general insight into the work that has been performed investigating the question of micro black holes as elementary particles.



William Brown
in, Resonance Sciense Foundation

Fractal geometry on all scales

river delta / human kidney / computer fractal / tree

Fractal geometry on all scales: 

the universe in a nutshell... 

Como Surgiu o Universo

O funcionamento do mundo foi por alguns atribuído a um Criador espantosamente metediço, mas incorpóreo, a guiar activamente cada electrão, quark e fotão até aos respectivos destinos. As minhas entranhas revolvem-se perante esta visão extravagante do funcionamento do mundo e a minha cabeça segue o mesmo caminho das entranhas.

...

Deixe-me considerar teologia e filosofia separadamente.
Acho que a teologia se limita a fingir uma explicação ao decretar que existe um deus que criou tudo, e algumas pessoas ficam satisfeitas com essa explicação. Mas é totalmente vazia porque, em primeiro lugar, não existe qualquer prova da existência de um deus; e, em segundo lugar, como pode um deus criar coisas, como pode um deus criar o Universo. Essa perspectiva é demasiado fácil. Os teólogos apresentam respostas fáceis, enquanto os cientistas precisam de muito trabalho para compreender e explicar. Nós, cientistas, estamos a chegar gradualmente a um ponto em que poderemos dar uma resposta verdadeira àquilo que os teólogos fingem compreender.
Mas a filosofia é outra coisa… Está algures entre a teologia e a ciência. A diferença entre filósofos e cientistas é que os filósofos são pessimistas, ao passo que os cientistas são optimistas.

Os filósofos dizem: 
“Nunca compreenderás, está para lá da compreensão humana.”
Enquanto os cientistas dizem: 
“Espera só um pouco, havemos de lá chegar.”

...

A ciência e a religião são totalmente incompatíveis.
Basicamente, a religião diz: 
“O teu cérebro é demasiado insignificante para compreender, nunca compreenderás. Há apenas a possibilidade de poderes perceber depois de morreres.” 
Eu prefiro o conhecimento deste lado do túmulo.


Peter Atkins
in, Como Surgiu o Universo

MULTIVERSOS: E NÓS NISSO TUDO?

Todo mundo concorda que o Universo é algo grande, certo?
Muito, muito grande, com bilhões de galáxias, mais estrelas do que grãos de areia, etc.
Todos esses números que nos fazem admirar a ordem que rege essa imensidão e que permite que sondas viajem por entre planetas e uma delas esteja neste momento nos limites do sistema solar (o mais longe que algo humano já foi).

Já fica difícil imaginar o Criador de tudo isso interessado especificamente num planetinha azul, mais especificamente ainda numa certa parte da população de um certo país desse planetinha, e mais especificamente ainda nos 10% do salário desta partezinha da população do planetinha azul perdido entre milhares de sistemas solares da periferia de uma das bilhões de galáxias desse Universo.

O que pensar então quando descobrimos que o Universo (repito, o UNIVERSO) é só um de VÁRIOS, se expandindo lado a lado? 

Sim, isso já é tratado como uma hipótese científica em estágio avançado de comprovação.
E se juntarmos isso à Teoria das Cordas, que prevê vários universos inflando DENTRO DO OUTRO, EM OUTRAS DIMENSÕES?
Então as possibilidades são infinitas, inimagináveis.

E as implicações disso para nós?
Infinitas, também.

A começar pela nossa arrogância de se achar o centro do Universo.
De achar que somos tão civilizados que podemos, ou melhor, DEVEMOS impor nossa civilidade (inclua aí religião, política, tecnologia, way of life, etc) a todas as outras pessoas do planeta (e baseados nisso se aparecerem ETs por aqui nós os catequizaremos).

No meio de tantas possibilidades podemos praticamente garantir que SIM, existem civilizações cuja evolução possa ter centenas, milhares ou talvez milhões de anos frente à nossa.
E o que pensar disso?
Se nós, com 5 mil anos de civilização (oficialmente falando) já temos Shopping Centers, Internet e gatinhos engarrafados, imagine como devem ser seres com 10 mil anos ou mais de história?
Será que eles ficam brigando entre si para ver qual Deus é o "certo"?
Será que ainda têm o conceito de Deus?
Será que ficam regulando a sexualidade dos outros?
Será que ainda têm sexualidade?

São perguntas que deveríamos nos fazer mesmo que nunca encontremos indícios de outros seres além de nós. Até porque somos inteligentes o suficiente para fazermos a extrapolação da evolução de nossa própria raça humana, e como nós passamos pela escravidão dos negros (justificada legal, religiosa e moralmente!), pelo extermínio de povos "bárbaros" (cátaros, celtas, vikings, astecas) e perseguições religiosas (os próprios cristãos sendo um ótimo exemplo).
Hoje nós temos leis, órgãos e um lastro moral que nos permitem, ao menos, protestar e tentar impedir quando essas coisas acontecem (e acontecem!).

Fico pensando em como outras civilizações nos vêem.
E creio que devem nos achar diferentes e difíceis da mesma forma que nós consideramos diferentes e difíceis os autistas.
Hoje sabemos que autistas têm uma consciência aguçada, são inteligentes (alguns até brilhantes) mas "funcionam" de forma diferente, em outro nível de percepção e expressão. Por não terem o mesmo verniz social que carregamos de fábrica e vamos lapidando no convívio e aprendizado, as emoções dos autistas podem acabar facilmente descambando para o exagero, para violência, para frustração. Mas também podem ser carinhosos, abraçar, beijar, mas sempre com suas dificuldades sociais.

E nós, humanos, podemos ser os autistas da galáxia! 
Somos em geral imaturos, sem "educação social intergalática" nenhuma, extremamente emotivos, violentos, mas da mesma forma podemos ser amorosos, carinhosos, empáticos, coisa que talvez numa sociedade muito regrada e evoluída não seja possível.

Pegue a série Star Trek como referência e veremos a relação entre Spock e os humanos como um ótimo mapa do que estou falando.
Poucos se predispõem a ter o tempo, vontade e amor suficientes para se comunicar e interagir com o autista clássico. Preferem tratá-los como produtos defeituosos, ignorá-los e viver suas vidas. 
Quem sabe se outros povos não fazem o mesmo com a raça humana?



in, Saindo da Matrix

Cosmic Alphabet

Mathematics 

is the alphabet 

with which God has written 

the universe.

 Galileo Galilei